2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the mixing performance of three passive micromixers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various investigations have been performed to characterize the mixing of fluids based on the analysis of laminar flow and mixing in passive micromixers such as T mixers, Y mixers, different types of serpentine micromixers [13,14], micromixers with patterned grooves [15][16][17], and split and recombine (SAR) micromixers [18][19][20][21]. Numerical and experimental studies were performed by Fang and Yang [22] on a three-dimensional (3-D) rotating microfluidic device with a range of Reynolds numbers from 0.01-100.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various investigations have been performed to characterize the mixing of fluids based on the analysis of laminar flow and mixing in passive micromixers such as T mixers, Y mixers, different types of serpentine micromixers [13,14], micromixers with patterned grooves [15][16][17], and split and recombine (SAR) micromixers [18][19][20][21]. Numerical and experimental studies were performed by Fang and Yang [22] on a three-dimensional (3-D) rotating microfluidic device with a range of Reynolds numbers from 0.01-100.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inlet integrated with T or Y joint is generally used for most micromixers and microfluidics systems [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Three different shapes of two-dimensional serpentine micromixer have been considered to evaluate the mixing index by Hossain et al [14]. Their numerical study revealed that the square wave micromixer showed better mixing than the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foregoing experiments and simulations have suggested that the no slip boundary condition is still valid for microscale fluid flow theory (Kozicki et al 2003;Cross et al 2006;Koumoutsakos et al 2003;Hossain et al 2009). …”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%