Evaluation of the Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Scoring System for Prediction of Mortality in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department

Abstract

To evaluate the ability of the Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (M-APACHE II) scoring system for the prediction of mortality in patients admitted to a tertiary emergency department in Iran. Methods: During the study period, all patients aged >12 years who had been admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Tehran, Iran were enrolled in the study. Traumatic and poisoned patients and those who died immediately after arriving at the emergency room were excluded. Using the M-APACHE II, risk of mortality was calculated for each patient. Finally, expected and observed mortalities were compared and the accuracy of M-APACHE II for prediction of mortality was determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Results: During the study period, 389 cases including 236 males (60.7%) were enrolled into the study. The mean age of the patients was 60.6±19.4 years (range 14 to 98 years). 117 patients died (30%) while the M-APACHE II predicted 129 deaths. The greatest discrepancy between observed and expected deaths occurred at M-APACHE II scores ≥21. The constructed area under the ROC curve basng on predicted and observed death was 0.938 (95% confidence interval 0.915-0.961). Conclusion: M-APACHE II is an accurate scoring system for predicting mortality in patients admitted to the emergency department. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Simplified Acute Physiology Score II/Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Prediction of the Mortality and Later Development of Complications in Poisoned Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit

“…It is the most well‐known and frequently used scoring system by physicians because it is reliable, in‐expensive and easily measurable . It has even been postulated to have correlation with the length of hospital stay . Although studies have been performed to compare the efficacy of different scoring systems in medical ICU patients or those admitted to the EDs , in most of these studies, the traumatic and poisoned patients have been excluded.…”