2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, mCIM demonstrated to be an excellent phenotypic test for carbapenemase detection (Table 1). Our findings corroborate the results of previous studies that have reported nearly 100% sensitivity and specificity of mCIM for detecting commonly found carbapenemase types such as KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like [18,30,31]. mCIM is suitable for a resource-poor microbiology laboratory as it is inexpensive and easy to perform.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, mCIM demonstrated to be an excellent phenotypic test for carbapenemase detection (Table 1). Our findings corroborate the results of previous studies that have reported nearly 100% sensitivity and specificity of mCIM for detecting commonly found carbapenemase types such as KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like [18,30,31]. mCIM is suitable for a resource-poor microbiology laboratory as it is inexpensive and easy to perform.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the three GES producers, although two of them were defined as negative, while CNP and mCIM did not detect any of them, Fluore-C, Fluore-Direct, and CIT detected two, three, and two isolates, respectively. This finding was partly in line with a previous study (34) where the sensitivity for GES-4 producers was 0% in CNP and 17% in CIM but 100% in mCIM. In another study involving 22 GES-6 producers, the CIM showed a sensitivity of 50% (35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The CLSI guideline stated that the CNP showed Ͼ90% sensitivity and mCIM showed Ͼ99% sensitivity when detecting class B carbapenemases, including NDM, VIM, and IMP, among Enterobacteriaceae isolates (28). Also, recent studies showed that the sensitivity for VIM producers was 85.7 to 100% with CNP, 71.4 to 100% with CIM, and 100% with mCIM (10,36,37) and the sensitivity for IMP producers was 93.8 to 100% with CNP, 93.8 to 100% with CIM, and 100% with mCIM (34,(38)(39)(40). Our results also coincided with these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The modified CIM (mCIM) became the CLSI-recommended method in 2017. A study indicated that both the sensitivity and specificity of mCIM were 100% (Kuchibiro et al, 2018). Because of its simplicity, clear criteria, cost-effectiveness, and availability in any laboratory, the mCIM has become a useful tool in microbiology laboratories.…”
Section: Rapid Detection Of Carbapenemasesmentioning
confidence: 99%