2017
DOI: 10.2172/1351858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB): 1998-2015

Abstract: Achieving higher penetrations of solar energy conversion on the national electricity grid and reducing system integration costs requires accurate knowledge of the available solar radiation resource. Specifically, understanding the impacts of clouds and other meteorological constituents on the solar resource and quantifying intra-/inter-hour, seasonal, and interannual variability are essential for accurately designing utility-scale solar energy projects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The satellite pixel represents a certain area, typically 1-100 km 2 . Depending on that size, some subpixel variability and cloudinduced parallax effects may contribute to higher random errors in both GHI and DNI, as suggested by previous studies (e.g., Habte et al 2017;Cebecauer et al 2011a;. The resolution of satellite images has limits to adequately describe properties of small and scattered clouds in the case of intermittent cloud situations.…”
Section: Challenges With Modeled Data Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The satellite pixel represents a certain area, typically 1-100 km 2 . Depending on that size, some subpixel variability and cloudinduced parallax effects may contribute to higher random errors in both GHI and DNI, as suggested by previous studies (e.g., Habte et al 2017;Cebecauer et al 2011a;. The resolution of satellite images has limits to adequately describe properties of small and scattered clouds in the case of intermittent cloud situations.…”
Section: Challenges With Modeled Data Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent studies, such as those by Habte et al (2017), Šúri and Cebecauer (2014), Wilcox (2012), or Cebecauer et al (2011a, discussed quantification methods aimed at a comprehensive representation of the model uncertainty using the GUM method. This implements the error statistics (bias, RMSE, and uncertainty) of those ground-based irradiance measurements used to evaluate the modeled data.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fortunately, the methodology for clear‐sky filtering based on time series irradiance data is well established in the literature. For the analysis that follows, time series irradiance data for each PV site are downloaded from the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB) . NSRDB is specifically chosen over site irradiance data because in many cases, the site irradiance instruments are mounted on the trackers that are under investigation.…”
Section: Methods For Determining Daily Tracker Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%