2006
DOI: 10.1175/mwr3264.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the NCEP Global Forecast System at the ARM SGP Site

Abstract: This study evaluates the performance of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) against observations made by the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program at the southern Great Plains site for the years 2001–04. The spatial and temporal scales of the observations are examined to search for an optimum approach for comparing grid-mean model forecasts with single-point observations. A single-column model (SCM) based upon the GFS was also used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include an interactive sea ice model, assimilation of satellite radiances, increased resolution in the atmospheric model, and most importantly, coupling between the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface models. The Global Forecast System (GFS) of Yang et al [2006] constitutes the atmospheric model, which has 38 km horizontal resolution and 64 layers extending from the surface to the 0.26 hPa level. The Geophysical Fluid Dynamic Lab's Modular Ocean Model (MOM) version 4 describes the ocean circulation at 0.25-0.5 resolution with 40 levels extending to 4737 m depth.…”
Section: Climate Forecast System Reanalysis and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include an interactive sea ice model, assimilation of satellite radiances, increased resolution in the atmospheric model, and most importantly, coupling between the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface models. The Global Forecast System (GFS) of Yang et al [2006] constitutes the atmospheric model, which has 38 km horizontal resolution and 64 layers extending from the surface to the 0.26 hPa level. The Geophysical Fluid Dynamic Lab's Modular Ocean Model (MOM) version 4 describes the ocean circulation at 0.25-0.5 resolution with 40 levels extending to 4737 m depth.…”
Section: Climate Forecast System Reanalysis and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations have been used to evaluate a number of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models (e.g. Mace et al, 1998;Hinkelman et al, 1999;Hogan et al, 2001;Morcrette, 2002;Guichard et al, 2003;Sengupta et al, 2004;Yang et al, 2006;Illingworth et al, 2007;Hogan et al, 2009;Bouniol et al, 2010;Paquin-Ricard et al, 2010). In the work presented here, we sample four months and compare short-range forecasts with ground-based observations of liquid and ice cloud fraction at five locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics include: mean cloud amount (e.g. Hogan et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2006;Illingworth et al, 2007), cloud frequency of occurrence (e.g. Mace et al, 1998;Hinkelman et al, 1999;Hogan et al, 2001Hogan et al, , 2009Bouniol et al, 2010), cloud fraction histograms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This input included maximum winds and storm positions at 6-h intervals from the NHC best track (Jarvinen et al 1984) and predictors from Reynolds SST (Reynolds et al 2002) and the NCEP Global Forecasting System (GFS) model analyses (Yang et al 2006 Fig. 1, but for negative .…”
Section: Preliminary Forecast Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%