Evaluation of the NEI visual functioning questionnaire as an interval measure of visual ability in low vision

Abstract

The National Eye Institute developed a visual functioning questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) designed to assess health-related quality of life of patients with visual impairments. The developers of the NEI-VFQ distributed the original 52 items into 13 different domains. The recommended method for scoring the NEI-VFQ is to linearly transform the sum of the ordinal ratings to each item within each domain to produce 13 scores. The major shortcoming of this scoring method is that sums of ordinal numbers do not necessarily generate valid measurement scales. However, Rasch models can be used to estimate interval measurement scales from ordinal responses to items. We administered 27 items from the 52-item NEI-VFQ to 341 patients with low vision. Rasch analysis was used to estimate the 'visual ability' required by each item for a particular response (item measures) and to estimate the 'visual ability' of each patient (person measures). The validity of the model was evaluated by examining the distributions of residuals for item and person measures. We observed that the 17 items we tested from the NEI-VFQ that require difficulty ratings produce a valid interval scale for low-vision patients. The estimated person measures of visual ability are linear with log MAR acuity. The ten items that require frequency or level of agreement ratings do not work together to produce a valid interval scale. Rather, these items appear to be confounded by other variables distributed in the patient sample (e.g. psychological state). The visual ability scale estimated from the 17 NEI-VFQ items is proportional to the visual ability scales estimated from two earlier studies that also elicited difficulty ratings from low-vision patients.

Visual function response to ocriplasmin for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and macular hole

“…Similar observations have been made in other studies (Massof & Fletcher 2001; Dougherty & Bullimore 2010; Marella et al. 2010).…”

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review

“…34 The latter instruments should therefore not 42 Two types of instruments can be distinguished based on the scoring systems within our selected tools. Seven questionnaires have to be rated on a simple ordinal scale, while two instruments are preference based measures (ie, ViSQoL 43,44 and GUI 38 ) where all patients are asked to choose between different health situations (eg, perfect health vs worst possible health/death).…”

The Assessment of Disability Related to Vision Performance-Based Measure in Diabetic Retinopathy

“…Health-related QoL surveys, including vision-specific questionnaires, are influenced by a very broad range of factors including patient personality, individual preferences, personal biases, mental health, desire to mislead and desire to please. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In an effort to 4/22 develop new methods of assessing the visual health of patients, several investigators have developed and tested standardized protocols that evaluate the ability of individuals to perform visually-intensive daily activities. Although the content of these different investigative techniques tend to vary in the specific activities tested, they all have a common focus on detecting changes in very basic and practical visual abilities required to perform daily activities.…”