2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2011.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the normal calcaneal angles in Egyptian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b) is formed by the line from the calcaneal sulcus to the tip of the anterior surface of the calcaneus, and the posterior facet. This angle was divided in three predefined groups based upon the normal values for Gissane's angle (mean 123 to 127°, with a standard deviation 6 to 8°, and a range from 108 to 138°) [22,23].…”
Section: Radiographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3b) is formed by the line from the calcaneal sulcus to the tip of the anterior surface of the calcaneus, and the posterior facet. This angle was divided in three predefined groups based upon the normal values for Gissane's angle (mean 123 to 127°, with a standard deviation 6 to 8°, and a range from 108 to 138°) [22,23].…”
Section: Radiographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c) is created from two intersecting lines: a line between the highest point of the posterior facet and the anterior surface, and a line in the plane of the inferior surface of the calcaneus. The normal values for calcaneal compression angles (mean is 31°, with a standard deviation of 4°, and a range from 24 to 44°) were used to divide the measurements in three predefined groups [23].…”
Section: Radiographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope this study will encourage future studies and aid in improving the management of calcaneal fractures in India. [7]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Several population studies have been performed examining Bohler's angle in normal uninjured subjects. 4,[7][8][9][10]11,16,20,23 Whereas these studies demonstrate consistency with individual side-by-side comparisons, variations in mean and range for Bohler's angle have been demonstrated in various ethnic populations. Bohler's angle is commonly quoted in the literature as a range from 20 to 40 degrees, and angles measured below this range have been demonstrated to have 99% specificity and 99% sensitivity for calcaneus fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%