2017
DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Novel Methotrexate Architect Chemiluminescent Immunoassay: Clinical Impact on Pharmacokinetic Monitoring

Abstract: The correlation between methods was excellent, and Passing-Bablok regression analysis detected no virtually difference in their results. Utilization of the CMIA-Architect assay to measure MTX concentrations would therefore not affect clinical decisions on MTX management, supporting its employment in routine MTX monitoring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, it was very valuable to develop a selective, sensitive, rapid and simple method to determine the MTX concentration in children's plasma. There were several analytical methods for the determination of MTX plasma including fluorescence polarization immunoassay, 15,16 HPLC, 17 and LC-MS/MS. 18 To some extent, these previous methods were not going to deal with emergency situations (an abnormally high concentration of MTX plasma and large sample size measurement) the reason why these existed had their own drawbacks, including time-consuming requirement for plasma sample preparation, long-term chromatographic run, and low sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, it was very valuable to develop a selective, sensitive, rapid and simple method to determine the MTX concentration in children's plasma. There were several analytical methods for the determination of MTX plasma including fluorescence polarization immunoassay, 15,16 HPLC, 17 and LC-MS/MS. 18 To some extent, these previous methods were not going to deal with emergency situations (an abnormally high concentration of MTX plasma and large sample size measurement) the reason why these existed had their own drawbacks, including time-consuming requirement for plasma sample preparation, long-term chromatographic run, and low sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, many methods have been developed for monitoring the blood concentration of MTX, such as immunoassay, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). However, these methods are costly, time-consuming, and complex. Thus, a rapid, simple, sensitive, specific, and low-cost method for monitoring the blood concentration of MTX is highly desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 poorer imprecisions than those obtained in previously published results with ARK on Cobas c502, that itself had poorer imprecisions than MTX-ARCHI. 17 Several authors compared assays for MTX determination vs TDX or mass spectrometry 10,16,17,[19][20][21] but no recent comparison was performed with HPLC method. The maximal and minimal systematic bias (-0.075 and 0.002 mM) were observed for MTX-TDX and MTX-ARCHI, respectively, below 0.1 mM in accord with bias criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%