2019
DOI: 10.1542/peds.144.2ma4.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Outcome of Patients Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Tripoli Using the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) Score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22] However, it was lower than other studies in the United States (14.5%), India (16.7%), Taiwan (22%), Pakistan, and Turkey (12.9-18%). 6,18,[23][24][25] The differences in these mortality rates can be due to population age range, diagnosis, and PICU environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22] However, it was lower than other studies in the United States (14.5%), India (16.7%), Taiwan (22%), Pakistan, and Turkey (12.9-18%). 6,18,[23][24][25] The differences in these mortality rates can be due to population age range, diagnosis, and PICU environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Study conducted by Costa et al showed PRISM score showed adequate discriminatory capacity and calibration and thus constitutes a useful gizmo for the assessment of prognosis for paediatric patients admitted to a tertiary PICU with a median value of 15 in deaths and ROC curve yielded a value of 0.76 (CI 95% 0.69-0.83) p<0.0001 whereas our study showed a median value of slightly higher of 21 and acceptable discriminatory capacity and calibration for the assessment of prognosis in PICU patients (p<0.0001) and showed satisfactory discriminatory performance in differentiating survivors from non-survivors, supporting the conclusion that higher PRISM scores are correlated with increased risk of death, similar other studies. [22][23][24][25][26][27] Martha et al evaluated the PRISM scores of 421 patients and showed good discriminatory performance with proper calibration. 23 Brakel et al and Leuteurtre et al showed that the PRISM score provides good discriminatory power for patients with meningococcal disease and in children with meningococcal septic shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRISM score is just one of the many parameters studied for the assessment of mortality among patients, and it is not the exact evaluating parameter to predict outcomes in a particular nutritional condition of critically ill children. It focuses on relevant physiological values such as weight for age and other such factors that predict outcomes such as LOS and mortality [8]. As a proposed effort, combining nutritional status with the PRISM score can be a more efficient approach to the prediction of outcomes such as mortality.…”
Section: Pediatric Risk Of Mortality (Prism) Score and Malnutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%