2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Parental Perspective instrument for pediatric cochlear implantation to arrive at a short version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of this clinical and research tool has been described earlier in several reports [13,25,26]. It is available in printed form in some recent articles [26][27][28], and it is also loadable for storing and analysis of the results and sharing anonymous data at http:// www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html. This questionnaire surveying phenomena of multi-faceted nature has been found to be valid and satisfactorily reliable in exploring parental experiences and views on the quality of life of the child and his/her family following cochlear implantation [26,27,29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of this clinical and research tool has been described earlier in several reports [13,25,26]. It is available in printed form in some recent articles [26][27][28], and it is also loadable for storing and analysis of the results and sharing anonymous data at http:// www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html. This questionnaire surveying phenomena of multi-faceted nature has been found to be valid and satisfactorily reliable in exploring parental experiences and views on the quality of life of the child and his/her family following cochlear implantation [26,27,29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finnish children have received almost exclusively only one implant. Coding strategies in use were ACE (28), N of M (1), CIS (4), and CIS+ (3). All children used their implant regularly, defined as a minimum of 6 h a day at least on 6 days a week.…”
Section: Children and Their Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items parallel questions on HRQoL instruments designed for adults or children using CI covering topics such as peer acceptance, self-image, and CI satisfaction [10,20,22,32,33] (please see details in Section 2). This paper presents an initial attempt to explore CI-specific quality of life in a large cohort of children and adolescents using CI.…”
Section: Condition-specific Hrqol In Children Using CImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,20,22,32,33]. Like the KINDL R , questions were posed in past tense and specifically addressed CI use such as, ''During the past week, I heard everything I needed to hear with my cochlear implant on.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A utilização de instrumentos específicos de avaliação é altamente vantajosa, pois permite a verificação da percepção dos pais e o fornecimento de informações sobre o desenvolvimento auditivo e de linguagem falada, e expressa mudanças significativas na percepção da família quanto à satisfação do usuário do IC. Estes dados auxiliam os profissionais no processo de intervenção e habilitação fonoaudiológica (DAMEN et al, 2007;MORETTIN et al, 2013). O fato dos maiores índices de qualidade de vida associada ao IC serem registrados nestes domínios, sugere que para os pais a capacidade auditiva e aquisição de linguagem se aplicam de forma prática no cotidiano destas crianças e contribuem para a inserção e ampliação das atividades sociais (familiares e não familiares) em decorrência da aceitação de suas competências em situações complexas de trocas comunicativas.…”
Section: Qualidade De Vidaunclassified