2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the performance of the Kenya Dual Purpose Goat composites: Additive and non-additive genetic parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
9
6
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
9
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our h 2 estimate for BWT was in accordance with the estimates obtained by using simple animal model (model 1) by Al-Shorepy et al (2002) for Emirati goats (0.30), Rashidi et al (2008) for Markhoz goats (0.35±0.04), Zhang et al (2008) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06), Kantanamalakul et al (2008) for mixed goat population (0.30±0.04) and Zhang et al (2009) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06). Current Estimate is higher than reports by Yalcin et al (1989) and Gerstmayr and Horst (1995) in Angora goats (0.00 and 0.02), Schoeman et al (1997) for Boer goats (0.16), Mugambi et al (2007) in the Kenya dual-purpose goats (0.13), Boujenane and El Hazzab (2008) for Draa goats (0.16), Roy et al (2008) for Jamunapari goats (0.12), Shaat and Maki-Tanila (2009) for Zairabi goats (0.10), and Maghsoudi et al (2009) for Iranian Cashmere goats (0.20). Higher estimate than current study was reported by Mourad and Anous (1998) in common African and Alpine crossbred goats (0.68), Portolano et al (2002) in Sicilian Girgentana goat (0.49), and Bosso et al (2007) in Dwarf goats (0.50).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Our h 2 estimate for BWT was in accordance with the estimates obtained by using simple animal model (model 1) by Al-Shorepy et al (2002) for Emirati goats (0.30), Rashidi et al (2008) for Markhoz goats (0.35±0.04), Zhang et al (2008) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06), Kantanamalakul et al (2008) for mixed goat population (0.30±0.04) and Zhang et al (2009) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06). Current Estimate is higher than reports by Yalcin et al (1989) and Gerstmayr and Horst (1995) in Angora goats (0.00 and 0.02), Schoeman et al (1997) for Boer goats (0.16), Mugambi et al (2007) in the Kenya dual-purpose goats (0.13), Boujenane and El Hazzab (2008) for Draa goats (0.16), Roy et al (2008) for Jamunapari goats (0.12), Shaat and Maki-Tanila (2009) for Zairabi goats (0.10), and Maghsoudi et al (2009) for Iranian Cashmere goats (0.20). Higher estimate than current study was reported by Mourad and Anous (1998) in common African and Alpine crossbred goats (0.68), Portolano et al (2002) in Sicilian Girgentana goat (0.49), and Bosso et al (2007) in Dwarf goats (0.50).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Information on heritability is essential for planning efficient breeding programs and for predicting response to selection (Falconer 1986). Heritability estimates for birth weight in the present study ranged between 0.15 and 0.28 which are higher than those reported by Mugambi et al (2007) and Roy et al (2008). On the other hand heritability estimates for body weight at various ages ranged from low to high (0.04-0.54).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand heritability estimates for body weight at various ages ranged from low to high (0.04-0.54). The lowest estimate (0.04) was for body weight at 1st month of age (from sire component) similar to the results of Mugambi et al (2007); while the highest heritability estimates (0.54) was for body weight at 4th month of age (from dam component). The result was nearly agreed with that obtained by Snyman & Olivier (1999) for Angora goat in South Africa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bittante et al (1996) verificaram apenas o efeito significativo da heterose materna em ovinos mestiços das raças Lamon e Finnsheep. Em caprinos mestiços das raças Anglo-nubiana, Galla e Toggenburg, Mugambi et al (2007) observaram o efeito da heterose individual. A diferença dos genes das raças Poll Dorset e Somalis Brasileira proporcionaram desvios significativos de 1,02 kg e -5,46 kg, respectivamente, em relação aos genes da raça Santa Inês (Tabela 1, modelo 1a).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified