Evaluation of the performance of yielding rockbolts during rockbursts using numerical modeling method

Abstract

The assessment of yielding rockbolt performance during rockbursts with actual seismic loading is essential for rockburst supporting designs. In this paper, two types of yielding rockbolts (D-bolt and Roofex) and the fully resin-grouted rebar bolt are modeled via the “rockbolt” element in universal distinct element code (UDEC) after an exact calibration procedure. A two-dimensional (2D) model of a deep tunnel is built to fully evaluate the performance (e.g., capacity of energy-absorption and control of rock damage) of yielding and traditional rockbolts based on the simulated rockbursts. The influence of different rockburst magnitudes is also studied. The results suggest that the D-bolt can effectively control and mitigate rockburst damage during a weak rockburst because of its high strength and deformation capacity. The Roofex is too “soft” or “smooth” to limit the movement of ejected rocks and restrain the large deformation, although it has an excellent deformation capacity. The resin-grouted rebar bolt can maintain a high axial force level during rockbursts but is easy to break during dynamic shocks, which fails to control rapid rock bulking or ejection. Three types of rockbolts cannot control the large deformation and mitigate rockburst damage effectively during violent rockbursts. The rockburst damage severity can be significantly reduced by additional support with cable bolts. This study highlights the effectiveness of numerical modeling methods in assessing the complex performance of yielding rockbolts during rockbursts, which can provide some references to improve and optimize the design of rock supporting in burst-prone grounds.

Drill tools sticking prediction based on adaptive long short-term memory

“…Rockburst as one of the most severe disasters in deep coal mining [1,2], can be prevented through drill-hole pressure relief [3][4][5]. However, the mechanical properties of the surrounding rock in the drill-hole pressure relief surface are changeable, which may lead to drilling tools sticking and affect production safety and efficiency.…”

Yielding performance of an intelligent terminal structure for cable bolts

“…Ductile rock bolts have strong deformation capacity but low rigidity and supporting force, such as friction bolts [12]. Energy-absorbing rock bolts are a new type of rock bolt developed for engineering problems such as control of large deformations of rock masses and resistance to rock bursts [13][14][15][16]. For example, D-bolts [9,17] absorb the impact energy of rock masses through friction resistance between the support point and filling mortar and plastic deformation of the bolt body, and Garford solid bars [18] absorb energy by the frictional resistance between the rock bolt body and the structure.…”