Evaluation of the Pet Robot CuDDler Using Godspeed Questionnaire

Tan, Yeow Kee; Wong, Adison; Wong, Anthony; Dung, Tran Anh; Tay, Adrian; Kumar, Dilip Limbu; Dat, Tran Huy; Ng, Weng Zheng; Yan, Rui; Tay, Benedict Tiong Chee

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39470-6_13

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As shown in Multimedia Appendix 6 [ 3 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 49 - 54 , 56 - 59 , 61 - 64 , 66 - 71 , 73 , 74 , 77 , 78 , 83 , 85 - 88 , 90 - 101 , 103 , 105 - 107 , 109 , 111 ], a total of 33 different robotic platforms were investigated in the included studies. Among them, the most popular robotic platforms are Pepper, Paro, Nao, iRobiQ, and Healthbot.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), physical robots with intelligent capabilities based on AI (hereinafter intelligent physical robots) have been applied in the health care context to expand the digitization of health care work processes and increase the use, fairness, and cost-effectiveness of health care services, such as in smart health care services [ 1 , 2 ], including telemedicine [ 3 ], ambient-assisted living [ 4 ], intelligent health management [ 5 ], psychotherapy [ 6 ], and companionship [ 7 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Huang¹,

Li²,

Suomi³

et al. 2023

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Intelligent physical robots based on artificial intelligence have been argued to bring about dramatic changes in health care services. Previous research has examined the use of intelligent physical robots in the health care context from different perspectives; however, an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in health care is lacking in the literature. Objective In this paper, we aimed to provide an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in health care and to propose potential agendas for future research through a systematic literature review. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review on intelligent physical robots in the health care field following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Literature searches were conducted in 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL) in May 2021, focusing on studies using intelligent physical robots for health care purposes. Subsequently, the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed an exploratory content analysis and synthesized the findings extracted from the included articles. Results A total of 94 research articles were included in the review. Intelligent physical robots, including mechanoid, humanoid, android, and animalistic robots, have been used in hospitals, nursing homes, mental health care centers, laboratories, and patients’ homes by both end customers and health care professionals. The antecedents for intelligent physical robot use are categorized into individual-, organization-, and robot-related factors. Intelligent physical robot use in the health care context leads to both non–health-related consequences (emotional outcomes, attitude and evaluation outcomes, and behavioral outcomes) and consequences for (physical, mental, and social) health promotion for individual users. Accordingly, an integrative framework was proposed to obtain an overview of the antecedents and consequences of intelligent physical robot use in the health care context. Conclusions This study contributes to the literature by summarizing current knowledge in the field of intelligent physical robot use in health care, by identifying the antecedents and the consequences of intelligent physical robot use, and by proposing potential future research agendas in the specific area based on the research findings in the literature and the identified knowledge gaps.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Huang¹,

Li²,

Suomi³

et al. 2023

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CuDDler is another example of a companion robot for elderly care developed in Singapore and used for patients with dementia and visual impairment (Moyle et al., ). CuDDler gained positive reactions and acceptance from the elderly (Tan et al., ). Interestingly, Sharkey and Sharkey () discovered that patients might confuse robotic systems with actual living things.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotics in Nursing: A Scoping Review

Maalouf

Sidaoui

Elhajj

et al. 2018

J of Nursing Scholarship

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Driven by the shortage in qualified nurses and the high percentage of aging populations, the past decade has witnessed a significant growth in the use of robots in nursing, especially in countries like Japan. This article is a scoping review of the different tracks in which robots are used in nursing. Whereas assistive robots are used for physical care, including service and monitoring tasks, social assistive robots focus on the cognitive and emotional well‐being of patients in need of companionship. Methods A total of six electronic databases were used in the search for journal papers and conference proceedings. The key words used in searching the databases were nursing OR nurses, AND robots OR robotics. Topics covering surgical robotics, nursing education robotics, and clinical procedures were excluded. Findings A total of 1,758 articles were retrieved, from which 69 articles were included in the final review. The analysis of the chosen papers led to the categorization of robots into two main categories: assistive robots and social assistive robots. Conclusions After a detailed review of the state of the art in assistive robots and social assistive robots, an insight into the future of robotics in this field is provided. The recommendations include the need to intensify research on human robot interaction, greater focus on monitoring robots, and analysis of the psychological barriers that need to be surmounted to achieve more tolerance and higher acceptance of robots. Clinical Relevance For researchers and developers to provide suitable technological solutions, a full understanding of robotics in nursing is needed. An overview of the most recent applications and their proper categorization is key to finding areas for contribution.

show abstract

“…The robot offers interactivity, which can communicate autonomously and communicate with others, using Internet-connectivity for being a partner. Tan et al, in [21] report the development of an interactive pet companion, CuDDler, with the capability to recognize verbal and non-verbal communication acts that are tied to the emotional state of a person. Their experiment indicated high ratings of the Godspeed attribute in "likeability" and "perceived safety".…”

Section: Bio-inspired Therapeutic Pet Robots: a Reviewmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Previous work covers studies involving a number of pets ranging from dog, cat, seal, and bear. With this, platforms have been developed and evaluated in the context of therapeutic scenarios [1]- [21]. Vast majority of such studies as presented in the literature above, points to successful improvement in physiological, psychological and social aspects within a therapeutic setting.…”

Section: Bio-inspired Therapeutic Pet Robots: a Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bio-inspired therapeutic pet robots: Review and future direction

Bharatharaj

Huang

Al‐Jumaily

2015

2015 10th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an extensive review of "bioinspired therapeutic pet robots", an emerging class of social robots deployed for therapeutic scenarios with a wide range of human stakeholders from elderly to autistic children. We begin by covering prominent literature that studies the roles and benefits of biological pets in therapeutic situations. We then present an overview on biologically inspired therapeutic pet robots. Finally, we discuss the needs and future potential for a parrot inspired robot and related research challenges.

show abstract

Evaluation of the Pet Robot CuDDler Using Godspeed Questionnaire

Cited by 9 publications

References 11 publications

Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

Robotics in Nursing: A Scoping Review

Bio-inspired therapeutic pet robots: Review and future direction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About