2015
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2014.2387848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Precision-Privacy Tradeoff of Data Perturbation for Smart Metering

Abstract: Abstract-Smart grid users and standardization committees require that utilities and third parties collecting metering data employ techniques for limiting the level of precision of the gathered household measurements to a granularity no finer than what is required for providing the expected service. Data aggregation and data perturbation are two such techniques. This paper provides quantitative means to identify a tradeoff between the aggregation set size, the precision on the aggregated measurements, and the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of eliminating the drawbacks brought by the TTP technique, data aggregation by the use of perturbation was proposed. The perturbation technique focuses on adding noise or some means of randomness to the metering data of each smart meter so that the aggregating node or entity does not infer the metering data [50], [51], [52]. One major drawback of aggregation protocols by means of perturbation is that due to the randomness added to each smart meter, the aggregated data can not reflect exactly the aggregated real metered data.…”
Section: ) Privacy Preservation During Data Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of eliminating the drawbacks brought by the TTP technique, data aggregation by the use of perturbation was proposed. The perturbation technique focuses on adding noise or some means of randomness to the metering data of each smart meter so that the aggregating node or entity does not infer the metering data [50], [51], [52]. One major drawback of aggregation protocols by means of perturbation is that due to the randomness added to each smart meter, the aggregated data can not reflect exactly the aggregated real metered data.…”
Section: ) Privacy Preservation During Data Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in 2012, the European Commission recommended keeping a frequency under 15 min to "allow the information to be used to achieve energy savings" [12]. Several works explore the trade-offs between privacy and the operational needs of Smart Grid data mainly by investigating different data resolution schemes and load shaping [2,8,26,42,43], but this research field is still considered to have many open challenges. In fact, the Smart Grid data minimisation is a well-studied case study for the more general problem of time series compression [9].…”
Section: Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savi et al [SRV15] presented an analysis on schemes based on noise to quantify a trade-off between the number of measurements that compound the consolidated consumption c j and the precision on c j . Some previous work used differential privacy [Dwo08] to analyze a specific PrivacyPreserving Protocol (PPP), for instance, the work of Jawurek and Kerschbaum [JK12].…”
Section: Quantifying the Aggregation Sizementioning
confidence: 99%