2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test in the Upper Extremity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional point of agreement between the current study and prior publications is the significant correlation between measures of physical function (qDASH, PROMIS PF CAT, and PROMIS UE CAT) among patients presenting to a hand surgery clinic. 5,8,9,13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An additional point of agreement between the current study and prior publications is the significant correlation between measures of physical function (qDASH, PROMIS PF CAT, and PROMIS UE CAT) among patients presenting to a hand surgery clinic. 5,8,9,13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Psychometric characteristics of the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Physical Function Upper Extremity (UE) CATs have been described specifically in the context of hand and upper extremity patients, and both correlate strongly with the DASH and quickDASH. 5,8,9 While some studies did not observe floor or ceiling effects for the PF CAT 5 and UE CAT 9 , others have demonstrated ceiling effects of 1.3% and 10.8%, respectively. 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…418 2017 used to perform objective measurements that are essentially independent of the observer; however, many of these are impractical for routine clinical use because of their size, complexity, hardware requirements, and expense 14,23,[25][26][27][28][29] . A recent article demonstrated that an inexpensive operator-independent objective shoulder motion measurement system based on the Microsoft Kinect can serve as a practical tool in the clinical examination room 26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size of the olecranon bursa and pain are certainly important contributing factors, but may not correlate well with the patient's reported function or general health status. This could be an existing fixed-length questionnaire (such as the DASH) or computerized adaptive testing (such as a PROMIS tool) [5]. A valid, reliable, and responsive tool for monitoring symptoms of olecranon bursitis will allow for determination of the MCID between treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%