2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule out criteria (PERC rule) in children evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism

Abstract: In this sample of children and teenagers with suspected PE, the PERC rule was negative in 31%, and demonstrated good overall diagnostic accuracy, including a low false negative rate. These data support the need for a large, prospective diagnostic validation study of PERC in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While clinical pretest probability tools such as the PE rule out criteria (PERC rule), Wells score, revised Geneva score (RGS), and simplified RGS have been developed to facilitate timely diagnosis of VTE in adults, 21 these tools have consistently shown poor performance and reliability in children with VTE. 18,19,22,23 Pilot work on a pediatric-specific clinical pretest probability tool has been published, for which further development and validation is planned. 23,24 Although D-dimer is used as a screening tool to rule out PE in low-risk adults, it is neither sensitive nor specific for pediatric VTE.…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While clinical pretest probability tools such as the PE rule out criteria (PERC rule), Wells score, revised Geneva score (RGS), and simplified RGS have been developed to facilitate timely diagnosis of VTE in adults, 21 these tools have consistently shown poor performance and reliability in children with VTE. 18,19,22,23 Pilot work on a pediatric-specific clinical pretest probability tool has been published, for which further development and validation is planned. 23,24 Although D-dimer is used as a screening tool to rule out PE in low-risk adults, it is neither sensitive nor specific for pediatric VTE.…”
Section: Diagnostic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplified, revised Geneva score, based on several clinical variables, i.e., hemoptysis, old age of more than 65 years, history of venous thromboembolism, tachycardia, unilateral lower limb pain with or without deep palpation and edema, active malignancy, and surgery or fracture of lower limb within 1 month prior to the suspected symptoms and signs, has been published to use for diagnosing pulmonary thromboembolism. The more scores patients get, the higher chance of pulmonary embolism patients have [28]. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography, magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography, and ventilation/perfusion scan could be used to diagnose pulmonary thromboembolism even though conventional pulmonary angiography is the gold standard [29].…”
Section: Venous Thromboembolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to 2 independent pediatric cohorts, the PERC rule had a high sensitivity for Hennelly et al (100%) and Kline et al (95.8%). However, specificities were lower, at 24% and 35%, respectively, which limits the usefulness of these rules in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When PE is considered in a differential diagnosis, there is considerable decisional conflict because the clinical presentation of PE overlaps with many common pediatric diseases. The current criterion standard for PE diagnosis is computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), but this carries the risk of radiation‐induced malignancy . Balancing the risk of missing a PE against the probable increased risk of a radiation‐induced malignancy presents a clinical conundrum for emergency medicine physicians caring for children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%