2015
DOI: 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Quality of Clinical Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation

Abstract: Clinical guidelines consistently recommended aerobic and resistance exercises. Overall, our critical review showed that the quality of CGs was at least moderate, with the greatest deficiencies being related to applicability and rigor of development domains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study [7] which appraised the quality of a number of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines, did so for only nine publications (7 of which were included in our sample) due to strict inclusion criteria and a failure to search the resources of professional associations. Of these publications, only four provided detailed exercise protocols, and one has since been archived due to its age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study [7] which appraised the quality of a number of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines, did so for only nine publications (7 of which were included in our sample) due to strict inclusion criteria and a failure to search the resources of professional associations. Of these publications, only four provided detailed exercise protocols, and one has since been archived due to its age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous examination [7] included only clinical practice guidelines, and was limited by strict inclusion criteria to 9 publications. Many documents which are produced by professional associations, and potentially used by clinicians to guide practice, were not included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low scoring was most consistently reported for the following domains: stakeholder involvement (specifically very restricted patient participation and involvement in the guideline development)[44,48,50], rigor of development (guidelines were mostly based on expert opinion rather than evidence) [41,44,49], applicability [41,43,44,46,48-51], editorial independence [41,44,49]. These findings are comparable to those we obtained while assessing the CPGs on vitamin D replacement in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These organizations include the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [46,50,53,54], the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) [53,55], the New Zealand Guidelines Group [43], the Royal College of Physicians of London [55], and the Canadian Task Force on Prevention Health Care group [55]. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based CPGs on anti-thrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, rigorously addressed several of the aforementioned caveats encountered in many CPGs [56-59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGREE-II;23,25,245,246,251,252,[256][257][258][259] no entanto, muito pouco se sabe sobre a qualidade da GPCs em países de baixa renda.23 No Brasil, os medicamentos dispensados pelo SUS na atenção primária são selecionados e dispensados pelos municípios 260. Idealmente, todos os medicamentos incluídos no SUS devem ser incorporados em conjunto com um guia de prática clínica (GPCs) para auxiliar os profissionais de saúde.…”
unclassified