1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the RapID yeast plus system for the identification of yeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained in this study were similar to those from previous reports (2,6,9,12,15,(17)(18)20) showing that the VITEK 2 and RapID Yeast Plus systems were comparable to other commercial methods (e.g., API 20C AUX and ID 32C) in their abilities to correctly identify yeast species. The VITEK 2 colorimetric YST card was recently developed to replace the older fluorimetric ID-YST card, yet a recent study conducted by Loïez et al (15) on 172 clinical yeast isolates showed that 161 (93.6%) and 144 (83.7%) isolates were correctly identified with the ID-YST and YST cards, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The data obtained in this study were similar to those from previous reports (2,6,9,12,15,(17)(18)20) showing that the VITEK 2 and RapID Yeast Plus systems were comparable to other commercial methods (e.g., API 20C AUX and ID 32C) in their abilities to correctly identify yeast species. The VITEK 2 colorimetric YST card was recently developed to replace the older fluorimetric ID-YST card, yet a recent study conducted by Loïez et al (15) on 172 clinical yeast isolates showed that 161 (93.6%) and 144 (83.7%) isolates were correctly identified with the ID-YST and YST cards, respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Commercial identification kits are faster, simpler to perform, and do not require special equipment. On the other hand, they rely on only a few tests, limiting their application in identifying environmental strains, although their usefulness for clinical isolates has been reported (8,12,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conventional methodology requires the evaluation of some 60 to 90 tests, resulting in a complex, laborious, and time-consuming process. In recent years, rapid kit identification methods have been developed to overcome the complexity of traditional methods (8,20,28). One of these methods, the API 20C AUX system (bioMèrieux, Lyon, France), has been widely used and consists of 19 assimilation tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%