2016 ASABE International Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.13031/aim.20162454205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Reduced State-Variable TOMGRO Model using Boundary Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective was to provide a standalone application in a way that end users unfamiliar with programming languages and/or crop modeling would have an easier access to yield prediction in different greenhouse environments. Data from spreadsheet version of the model were used for testing the Simulink blocks and validation of the results [25]. The five state variables included in the tomato growth model of Ref.…”
Section: Simulation Of Expected Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective was to provide a standalone application in a way that end users unfamiliar with programming languages and/or crop modeling would have an easier access to yield prediction in different greenhouse environments. Data from spreadsheet version of the model were used for testing the Simulink blocks and validation of the results [25]. The five state variables included in the tomato growth model of Ref.…”
Section: Simulation Of Expected Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This description completely explicates the reduced state-variable tomato model implemented in Simulink for this project, and the state-variable equations for LAI, total biomass accumulation (dW=dt), total fruit weight (dW F =dt), and mature fruit weight ((dW M =dt)) are highlighted. The implemented model was validated [25] using the Lake City experiment datasets of Ref. [24] to show that the Simulink version of the model is an exact replication of the original spreadsheet version.…”
Section: Plant Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%