1980
DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1980.44.8.tb01390.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the retention of two sealants applied by dental students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because RBS complete retention rate is a measure of their effectiveness in preventing caries (29), the overall relative caries risk reduction of 71.26% (69.29–72.94) for ARBS indicated by Llodra et al., could probably also be inferred to LRBS (18). However, considering the more recent meta‐analysis of Mejare et al (19), which adopted much stricter inclusion criteria, the pooled relative risk reduction estimate for ARBS was 33% (17–45). Thus, it would be possible to extrapolate saying that 67% of the caries in subjects treated with LRBS were prevented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because RBS complete retention rate is a measure of their effectiveness in preventing caries (29), the overall relative caries risk reduction of 71.26% (69.29–72.94) for ARBS indicated by Llodra et al., could probably also be inferred to LRBS (18). However, considering the more recent meta‐analysis of Mejare et al (19), which adopted much stricter inclusion criteria, the pooled relative risk reduction estimate for ARBS was 33% (17–45). Thus, it would be possible to extrapolate saying that 67% of the caries in subjects treated with LRBS were prevented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para este estudo, 70% dos dentes apresentavam padrões adequados de retenção do selante. Segundo estudo realizado por estudantes de Odontologia da Universidade Regional de Blumenau (Furb) 13 , os padrões de retenção de selante, quando aplicados por estudantes, estiveram em níveis abaixo deste estudo, com 31% de retenção total do selante resinoso, 6% do cimento de ionômero de vidro e 40% da resina Flow, embora a literatura ressalte não haver diferenças entre a retenção dos selantes entre profissionais especializados ou generalistas 26 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified