2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00274-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the role of pin fixation versus collar and cuff immobilisation in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected the cases which fall into Gartland Type III/Unstable Type II classification. (17) The average age group was found to be five years. It was found that the injury in children was caused by low energy trauma.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We selected the cases which fall into Gartland Type III/Unstable Type II classification. (17) The average age group was found to be five years. It was found that the injury in children was caused by low energy trauma.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, surgical treatment was associated with the risk of superficial infection. 14 Compartment syndrome incidence varies from 0.1% to 0.3%. 3 The combination of the SCFH with ipsilateral forearm fracture represents a major risk factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children have been treated by various methods, including manipulation and immobilisation, [11][12][13] continuous traction, 1,6,12,[14][15][16][17][18] percutaneous pinning 10,11,17,19,20 and open reduction. [21][22][23][24] Clinical results appear generally good using any of these approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%