Evaluation of the screw tent-pole technique for the repair of anterior maxilla width defects: a prospective, randomized, split-mouth study

Guillen, Gabriel Albuquerque; Araujo, André; Macêdo, F.G.C.; Groppo, Francisco Carlos; Vargas, Pablo Agustı́n; Nóia, Cláudio Ferreira

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.10.008

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These can be ridge deficiencies in the horizontal (buccal‐lingual) direction, deficiencies in the vertical (apical‐coronal) direction or combination type defects presenting dimensional deficiencies in both directions 47,48 . Compared to a self‐contained ridge defect that is surrounded by four bony walls (example: alveolar socket), non‐self‐contained ridge defects require additional surgical manipulations such as decortication of the existing bone walls, 46,47 placement and fixation of a barrier membrane under the flap prior to bone grafting and, potentially, use of tenting screws to create and maintain space during healing 49 . In addition, the need for non‐resorbable barrier membranes is more crucial in treating these types of defects to create and maintain the space 50 .…”

Section: Complications By Tissue Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Leblebicioglu,

Tatakis

2023

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral rehabilitation through implant supported dental restorations often requires a ridge augmentation procedure (RAP) prior to implant fixture placement since tooth extraction/loss results in alveolar ridge deficiencies. Although RAP‐related surgical techniques and biomaterials have been in practice for several decades, outcomes are not always predictable. Post‐surgical complications experienced during the early or late wound healing phases may jeopardize the targeted ideal ridge dimensions, required for implant fixture placement, and may have other consequences, such as negatively impacting the patient's quality of life. This review describes reported post‐surgical complications following RAP under the following subtitles: complications by tissue type, complications in function and aesthetics, complications by healing time, complications by biomaterial type, and complications by surgical protocol modalities. Specifically, RAP performed by using particulate bone graft substitutes and related complications are explored. Modalities developed to prevent/manage these complications are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Complications By Tissue Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Leblebicioglu,

Tatakis

2023

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A tenting screw combined with titanium mesh may reduce the need for autogenous bone grafting in the reconstruction of severely atrophic ridges, and improves the survival of implants [13,14]. The gained bone width was 0.91 to 4.37 mm in grafting with tenting screws [15]. But the related research still rare.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Horizontally ridge reconstruction using titanium mesh with tenting screw vs autologous bone graft: a retrospective study

Chen

Zhou

Ding

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the horizontal bone gain at the different level of alveolar bone using titanium screw as a reference plane by titanium mesh with tent screw (exposed or not) and autologous bone grafting.Methods: 16 patients and 23 measured points were enrolled in this study. CBCT data of immediately and 6 months after bone grafting were measured at crestal (CW), midway (MW), and basal (BW) level and reconstructed for area measurement using titanium screw as reference plane. The exposure of titanium mesh or not had been evaluated.Results: The area of bone gained and absorption ratio were almost the same without statistical different. There were not statistical different between the titanium mesh and onlay grafting, and measured level at CW, MW, and BW, and the exposed titanium mesh and not exposed one. The width absorption ratio of titanium mesh and onlay grafting group or at CW, MW, and BW were almost the same. However, the width absorption ratio of the exposed titanium mesh at CW, MW, and BW were significantly higher than the not exposed one. Thin biotype was a main factor of the exposure of titanium mesh. The exposed titanium mesh at late phase also can achieve clinically accepted bone gained after certain anti-inflammatory treatment. Conclusions: Ti-mesh with tenting screw could achieve the same bone augmentation effect as the autogenous bone block did, even it is exposed at late phase. However, the absorption ratio significantly increased if exposed.

show abstract

Alveolar Ridge Defects and Bone Augmentation Techniques: Surgical Algorithm

2022

Essential Techniques of Alveolar Bone Augmentation in Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of the screw tent-pole technique for the repair of anterior maxilla width defects: a prospective, randomized, split-mouth study

Cited by 5 publications

References 16 publications

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Horizontally ridge reconstruction using titanium mesh with tenting screw vs autologous bone graft: a retrospective study

Alveolar Ridge Defects and Bone Augmentation Techniques: Surgical Algorithm

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About