2018
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) MRI for Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Inhomogeneous magnetization transfer is a new endogenous MR imaging contrast mechanism that has demonstrated high specificity for myelin. Here, we tested the hypothesis that inhomogeneous magnetization transfer is sensitive to pathology in a population of patients with relapsing-remitting MS in a way that both differs from and complements conventional magnetization transfer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetization transfer ratio correlated with cognitive disability in SPMS patients’ NAGM ( r = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and NAWM ( r = 0.33, p < 0.0001) but not with EDSS . Inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio in white matter structures correlated with physical disability . Lastly, the T 1 /T 2 ‐weighted ratio has recently been applied clinically to found differences in the cortex and in the white matter of MS patients compared to controls, but its specificity to myelin, primarily in white matter, has been questioned .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetization transfer ratio correlated with cognitive disability in SPMS patients’ NAGM ( r = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and NAWM ( r = 0.33, p < 0.0001) but not with EDSS . Inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio in white matter structures correlated with physical disability . Lastly, the T 1 /T 2 ‐weighted ratio has recently been applied clinically to found differences in the cortex and in the white matter of MS patients compared to controls, but its specificity to myelin, primarily in white matter, has been questioned .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies comparing SyMRI MVF and myelin water imaging in patients with MS should be conducted to analyze the association between these metrics. Second, we chose to investigate MTsat, which is thought to be an improvement over MTR, but some new magnetization transfer techniques, for example, inhomogeneous magnetization transfer, have been developed that may increase the sensitivity and specificity for myelin [56]. Third, even though we slightly undersegmented plaques to mitigate possible misregistration and the partial volume effect, the acquired images were gapped at 1 mm and there may have been inevitable partial volume effects that have contributed to bias in the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of apparent T 1D on power has been demonstrated in this work, and yielded important knowledge on how the ihMT signal is generated and filtered, all consistent with the dipolar order theory. Currently, clinical investigations of ihMT are typically performed at either 1.5T or 3T [40], which can deliver B 1RM S around 4µT and 2µT , respectively. Whereas the RF power may reach higher levels during the saturation periods [27,28], one has to keep these orders of magnitude in mind when interpreting in vivo ihMT data and associate them with putative T 1D values.…”
Section: In Vivo Multiple Tmentioning
confidence: 99%