2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01085.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the seroprevalence of rubella in the region of Dakar (Senegal)

Abstract: SummaryData on the seroepidemiology of rubella in tropical African countries are still scarce. To determine the seroprevalence in Senegal, we conducted a 6 year retrospective survey among women of child bearing age in the urban region of Dakar, Senegal. The global seroprevalence determined with a commercial enzyme immunoassay among 3471 serological results was 90.1%. The distribution of this prevalence appeared stable with no significant difference between the years of study, age groups, and the socio-economic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
8
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall seroprevalence of rubella among pregnant women was found to be 89% (95% CI 86.3-91.3%). A similar finding has been reported from other African countries such as Senegal (90.1%) (Dromigny et al, 2003) and Namibia (85.0%) (Jonas et al, 2016). However, the overall seroprevalence in this study is higher than reports from other African countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (58.97%) (Zanga et al, 2017), Sudan (65%) (Hamdan et al, 2011), and Nigeria (68%) (Bamgboye et al, 2004), and lower than reports from Burkina Faso (95%) (Tahita et al, 2013a,b) and Zimbabwe (92%) (Mamvura et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The overall seroprevalence of rubella among pregnant women was found to be 89% (95% CI 86.3-91.3%). A similar finding has been reported from other African countries such as Senegal (90.1%) (Dromigny et al, 2003) and Namibia (85.0%) (Jonas et al, 2016). However, the overall seroprevalence in this study is higher than reports from other African countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (58.97%) (Zanga et al, 2017), Sudan (65%) (Hamdan et al, 2011), and Nigeria (68%) (Bamgboye et al, 2004), and lower than reports from Burkina Faso (95%) (Tahita et al, 2013a,b) and Zimbabwe (92%) (Mamvura et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This seroprevalence is similar to results from two other studies carried out in Sudan and Nigeria, which showed a seroprevalence of 65-68%, respectively [1821]. On the other hand, studies conducted in Burkinafaso, Senegal and Iran showed higher rubella seroprevalence (95.0, 90.1 and 96.2%, respectively) among pregnant women [22, 23]. Another study conducted among urban and rural pregnant women in Namibia showed an overall rubella seroprevalence of 85%, with urban women having higher risk of infection [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The rubella seropositivity obtained in this study is within this range. It is also similar to 93.5% obtained in a previous study among women of child bearing age in Oyo state by Adesina et al (8) and 90.1% obtained among women 15-45 years of age in Senegal by Dromigny et al (15). Conversely, it is at variance from a previous study by Agbede et al (12) among pregnant women at UITH, Ilorin where a value of 16.3% was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%