1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3774-4_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the SPP-II test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the classi®cation of Marre et al (1991) was applied the dierences between the groups were less pronounced (Table 3). Logistic regression models did not reveal an association between the in¯uencing variables age, duration of exposure, day of the week, education, consumption of alcohol, and pack-years and the target variables CCI, number of (real) errors made on the SPP2 test, and the classi®cation of the SPP2 test according to Marre et al (1991). The lack of association may be attributable to the small sample size n 24.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the classi®cation of Marre et al (1991) was applied the dierences between the groups were less pronounced (Table 3). Logistic regression models did not reveal an association between the in¯uencing variables age, duration of exposure, day of the week, education, consumption of alcohol, and pack-years and the target variables CCI, number of (real) errors made on the SPP2 test, and the classi®cation of the SPP2 test according to Marre et al (1991). The lack of association may be attributable to the small sample size n 24.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…This symbol was misread by almost all observers with normal color vision (Pinckers et al 1985). According to Marre et al (1991) we counted the possible errors of blue-yellow type as well. A possible error means that the left ®gure of plate 5, 6, 8, or 9 is less well recognized than the right one when both ®gures are read correctly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation