2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-05311-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the stability of standard reference genes of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells during in vitro proliferation and differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, its use as a reference would not be optimal for use when comparing changes in gene expression associated with induction of differentiation over time [35]. This finding has been reported from studies of differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells [36], from human liver samples [37], in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) animal models [38], different pig tissues [39], and plant samples [40]. Those reports show that when GAPDH was used as an internal control, the investigated GOI had no significant change or had fluctuating patterns of expression, indicating that GAPDH is unreliable for RT-qPCR analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, its use as a reference would not be optimal for use when comparing changes in gene expression associated with induction of differentiation over time [35]. This finding has been reported from studies of differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells [36], from human liver samples [37], in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) animal models [38], different pig tissues [39], and plant samples [40]. Those reports show that when GAPDH was used as an internal control, the investigated GOI had no significant change or had fluctuating patterns of expression, indicating that GAPDH is unreliable for RT-qPCR analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We actually found ACTB to be acceptably stable for hBM-MSC but less consistent for hAT-MSC. We did not agree that GUSB was a poor reference gene for hAT-MSC [70], perhaps reflecting our use of FBS-free culture media. The MIQE guidelines discouraged large discrepancies in transcript abundance between reference and target genes and recommend more than one reference gene [71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, PCS‐500‐011 primary human ADMSCs served as a model for studying mechanisms related to human MSC differentiation (Choi et al, 2015; Gonzalez Suarez et al, 2021; Li et al, 2013, 2019; Yang et al, 2018). They were also employed for evaluating the stability of standard reference genes during the proliferation and differentiation of human ADMSCs (Ayanoglu et al, 2020) and contributing to cell validation in karyotypic analyses of MSCs (Hwang et al, 2013). Beyond MSC differentiation, PCS‐500‐011 has found application in exometabolome research (Bispo et al, 2022) and investigations concerning paracrine secretory factors involved in angiogenesis in humans (Sun et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%