2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the stiffness chain on the deflection of end-mills under cutting forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
56
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement was done in the middle of the X, Y and Z travels of the machine, X = 4,000 mm, Y = 600 mm and Z = 1,000 mm respectively, figure 9 shows the measurement results for the three machine axes. The [28] , tool deflection like Salgado et al [29] and machine stiffness like Rivin [30] studied. Salgado et al [29] concluded that these factors may be considered if the head stiffness is greater than 62 N/mm in the Y-axis, 33 N/mm in the X-axis and 67 N/mm in the Z-axis.…”
Section: Head Manufacture and Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement was done in the middle of the X, Y and Z travels of the machine, X = 4,000 mm, Y = 600 mm and Z = 1,000 mm respectively, figure 9 shows the measurement results for the three machine axes. The [28] , tool deflection like Salgado et al [29] and machine stiffness like Rivin [30] studied. Salgado et al [29] concluded that these factors may be considered if the head stiffness is greater than 62 N/mm in the Y-axis, 33 N/mm in the X-axis and 67 N/mm in the Z-axis.…”
Section: Head Manufacture and Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The [28] , tool deflection like Salgado et al [29] and machine stiffness like Rivin [30] studied. Salgado et al [29] concluded that these factors may be considered if the head stiffness is greater than 62 N/mm in the Y-axis, 33 N/mm in the X-axis and 67 N/mm in the Z-axis. The stiffness of the new head clearly exceeds these values in the three axes given that the total stiffness of the milling machine as a whole is around these values for the Y-and X-axes, and that the stiffness in the Z-axis is determined mainly by the stiffness of the ram, which is the most flexible element on this axis of the machine.…”
Section: Head Manufacture and Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In machining by material removal, some variability due to geometric, kinematic, thermal, and mechanical errors (deflection of the cutting tool) are a source of generating geometric irregularities [1][2][3] affecting randomly the quality of the finite piece. Taking into account these uncertainties in the control procedures and optimization of cutting conditions is therefore of great interest for a better mastery of productivity and of the desired quality of the pieces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For touching workpiece in high-speed machining of dies and molds characterized by large-scale and deep cavity, LSFH is more suitable than those traditional hold systems such as the collet chuck and the static pressure expansive chuck because of its simple structure, high balance accuracy, and high clamping strength (Zhou et al 2012;Tony and Schmitz 2007;Zhang 2006). Several works had been carried out to investigate the stiffness and defection of the cutting tool system which will affect the machining precision and surface quality (Salgado et al 2005). Some scholars focus on the estimation of the geometrical accuracy in multi-axis milling process (Lamikiz et al 2008) and the topography prediction of ball-end milled surfaces, considering the tool parallel axis offset (Arizmendi et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%