2006
DOI: 10.1515/zna-2006-3-412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Structure of Amorphous Tungsten Oxide W28O72 by the Combination of Electron-, X-Ray- and Neutron-Diffraction (Three-Beam Experiment)

Abstract: From the combination of quantitative electron-diffraction data with X-ray-and neutron-diffraction data (so-called three-beam experiment) the partial structure factors and pair correlation functions of amorphous sputter deposited W 28 O 72 were determined. On the basis of the experimental atomic distances and coordination numbers, and by comparison with crystalline WO 3 , a structural model was developed, which consists of twisted WO 6 octahedra. Reverse Monte Carlo simulation in accordance with the experimenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary, the scattering due to O atoms contributes more to than that of W atoms, because neutrons interact with the atomic nucleus. These distinct features, the relative amplitude, peak position and the line-shape in our calculated , and Q [ S ( Q )−1] patterns agree with previous data reported for stoichiometric W-based oxides from X-ray, electrons and neutron diffraction experiments 18 22 , and show a qualitative similarity to data for sub-stoichiometric W oxide 23 .
Figure 3 Structure pair correlation functions.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary, the scattering due to O atoms contributes more to than that of W atoms, because neutrons interact with the atomic nucleus. These distinct features, the relative amplitude, peak position and the line-shape in our calculated , and Q [ S ( Q )−1] patterns agree with previous data reported for stoichiometric W-based oxides from X-ray, electrons and neutron diffraction experiments 18 22 , and show a qualitative similarity to data for sub-stoichiometric W oxide 23 .
Figure 3 Structure pair correlation functions.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, such model results are unrealistic since they do not take into account the contribution of distinct atomic environments to the total D ( R ) of a WO 3 . Structural characterizations of a WO 3 in terms of crystalline phases are ambiguous because the monoclinic/hexagonal WO 3 , and the W x O z -like Magnéli phases exhibit very analogous D ( R ) functions 23 . Because of the local-structural reconstruction at nonequivalent atomic environments, amorphous materials should display a distribution of interatomic distances, and lower average atomic coordination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%