Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of the Social-Economic-Natural Compound Ecosystem in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Urban Agglomeration (China): Based on Complex Network Analysis

Zhao, Feng; Chen, Zinan; Cai, Hechang

doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.938450

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chu et al [15] used the coupled coordination model to analyze the population, economy, society, ecological environment urbanization level and their coupled coordinated development degree in Russia. Achieving the sustainable development of the system is very important, and the Greater Bay Area and its surrounding areas have regional development imbalance problems [16]. Zhao et al [17] used the Yellow River Basin of China as a research object, constructed an index system of economic development and ecological status in the Yellow River Basin and analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution trend of the coupling degree and coordination degree of economic development and ecological state.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and Differentiation Analysis of China’s Construction of Ecological Civilization from the Perspective of Collaboration: Using China’s Representative Region as an Example

Zhou,

Wang

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The construction of ecological civilization is an important part of the cause of Chinese socialism, and the evaluation of the construction of ecological civilization and the differentiated analysis of its synergistic development will guide the coordinated development and coordinated ecological governance and protection in China. Synergistically, an evaluation index system was constructed based on the social–economic–natural multisystem, and the deviation coefficient coupling coordination model was used to evaluate the construction of the ecological civilization of 83 cities in the region from 2000 to 2020. The spatial and temporal development characteristics were explored using the spatial autocorrelation index and standard deviational ellipse, and the urban–rural differences were quantitatively analyzed by using the Thiel index. The results show that from 2000 to 2020, the degree of coordinated development of the social–economic–natural multisystem in different cities was low, and there are different reasons for cities with different urban–rural divisions. In this study region, the spatial distribution of the social–economic–natural coordinated development of cities is becoming increasingly discrete, and the center of urban distribution, which has a higher level of coordinated development, is gradually shifting to the southwest. In 2020, the level of coordinated social–economic–natural development in the study area was significantly different in urban and rural areas.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%