2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the thermal efficiency and a cost analysis of different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous studies, spiral tube HEX was found to have a higher heat transfer rate than double U-tube HEX 13 and W-tube HEX. 22 While triple U-tube HEX was found to have a higher heat transfer rate than double U-tube and single U-tube 12,16 , and higher than that of W-tube HEX, 12 16,17 Jalaluddin et al 20 found that increasing the flow rate of the working fluid from 2 L/min to 4 L/min led to an increase in the amount of heat transferred. They only found a slight increase in the amount of heat transferred after increasing the flow rate from 4 L/min to 8 L/min.…”
Section: Energy Pile Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous studies, spiral tube HEX was found to have a higher heat transfer rate than double U-tube HEX 13 and W-tube HEX. 22 While triple U-tube HEX was found to have a higher heat transfer rate than double U-tube and single U-tube 12,16 , and higher than that of W-tube HEX, 12 16,17 Jalaluddin et al 20 found that increasing the flow rate of the working fluid from 2 L/min to 4 L/min led to an increase in the amount of heat transferred. They only found a slight increase in the amount of heat transferred after increasing the flow rate from 4 L/min to 8 L/min.…”
Section: Energy Pile Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al 2013;Go et al 2014;Man et al 2011). Comparative studies have shown helical pipe arrangements to potentially offer greater heat transfer rates compared to standard energy pile arrangements Yoon et al 2015). At least some of this advantage is due to the greater pipe lengths that can be accommodated within the pile using the spiral arrangement.…”
Section: Pipe Arrangements and Pile Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy geostructures are foundations or other buried geotechnical structures which have been equipped with heat transfer pipes so that they may act as the ground heat exchanger (GHE) part of a GSHP system. Therefore, energy geostructures remove the need for construction of special purpose GHEs, offering opportunities to reduce capital costs for shallow geothermal energy (CIBSE, 2013;Park et al 2015;Lu and Narsilio 2019;Akrouch et al 2018). Piles are the most common type of energy geostructure, having been first constructed in northern Europe in the 1980's (Brandl 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars had conducted research on the heat exchange efficiency of energy piles. Bozis et al (2011) evaluated the effects of design parameters on the efficiency of heat transfer in energy piles [13]; estimated the constructability and heat exchange efficiency of large diameter cast-in-place energy piles with various configurations of heat exchange pipes [14]; Yoon et al (2015) reported the thermal efficiency and cost analysis of different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles [15]; Cecinato and Loveridge (2015) analyzed the factors influencing the thermal efficiency of energy piles [16]; Astrain et al (2016) performed a comparative study of different heat exchanger systems in a thermoelectric refrigerator and their influence on efficiency [17]; Akrouch et al (2016) conducted experimental, analytical, and numerical studies on the thermal efficiency of energy piles in unsaturated soils [18]. On energy piles, there are some more research papers which provide technical guidelines for the construction of heat exchanger [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%