Evaluation of the treatment of distal radial volar fracture by different methods sparing the pronator quadratus

Abstract

Objective The traditional volar approach requires the release of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle in the treatment of distal radius fractures. However, intraoperative repair of the PQ muscle often fails due to tissue injury and unstable muscle repair. This study compared the outcomes of different methods of sparing the PQ muscle combined with the volar plate in treating distal radius fractures. Methods A total of 95 patients with distal radius fractures sparing the PQ muscle were enrolled with the brachioradialis (BR) splitting approach (group A, 33 people), the volar plating insertion PQ muscle approach (group B, 35 people) and traditional Henry approach without sparing PQ muscle (group C, 27 people). Postoperative internal fixation, fracture healing and postoperative complications were observed in the three groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) of postoperative wrist pain was compared between three groups. The Dienst joint scale was used to evaluate the wrist function of patients, and imaging indexes were used to evaluate the surgical efficacy. Results A total of 95 patients with distal radius fractures were followed up for more than one year after surgery. All fractures obtained good union, with no vascular injury, nerve injury or wound infection. Outcomes at three days, one month and three months all showed no significant differences in postoperative imaging indexes among three groups and no significant differences in various indexes among three groups during the same period. The mean operative time in group C was significantly lower than that in groups A and B. There was significant difference in the mean operation time between group A and group B. The amount of mean operative blood loss or mean bone union time in groups A and B was significantly lower than those in group C. No significant difference was shown in mean operative blood loss or mean bone union time between group A and group B. No significant differences in limb function scores, VAS scores and the mean range of motion existed among three groups at the 12-month postoperative follow-up. However, outcomes assessed one week, one month and three months after surgery demonstrated significant differences in the VAS scores and the mean range of motion among three groups, and the group B had lower VAS score and greater the mean range of motion. According to Dienst score, the excellent rate in groups A, B and C was 91.0% (30/33), 94.2% (33/35) and 85.2% (23/27), respectively, at 12 months after surgery. Tendon irritation occurred in 2 cases and joint stiffness in 1 case in group A. In group B, there were 2 cases traumatic arthritis and 2 cases delayed carpal tunnel syndrome and 1 case tendon irritation. In group C, tendon irritation and delayed carpal tunnel syndrome occurred, respectively, in 3 cases. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that these two different surgical approaches were effective ways to reserve PQ and had good clinical outcomes. The volar plating insertion PQ muscle approach could reduce early postoperative pain, promote early activity and return to normal life, while the BR splitting approach was more advantageous in intraoperative fracture exposure and could shorten the operative time. However, some defects also existed. At 12 months of follow-up, no significant advantage was seen in sparing the PQ muscle. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of their individual characteristics and choose patients carefully.