2011
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2011.611773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the University of Virginia Leadership in Academic Medicine Program

Abstract: Although the benefits of LAM participation are sustained for some years, there is a need for reinforcement to prevent skill attrition. That lower percentages of Long-Term Post-LAM women had leadership aspirations requires further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
29
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The second study replicated the before and after findings but also compared the results with those who applied for the programme but were unsuccessful and a matched control group who did not apply, finding statistically significant improvements in self-rated indicators of skills, knowledge and attitudes relating to leadership and administration (Dannels et al 2008). A similar finding was observed in two separate university specific programmes (Thorndyke et al 2006;Sanfey et al 2011).…”
Section: Postgraduate Trainingsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second study replicated the before and after findings but also compared the results with those who applied for the programme but were unsuccessful and a matched control group who did not apply, finding statistically significant improvements in self-rated indicators of skills, knowledge and attitudes relating to leadership and administration (Dannels et al 2008). A similar finding was observed in two separate university specific programmes (Thorndyke et al 2006;Sanfey et al 2011).…”
Section: Postgraduate Trainingsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Two papers focused on postgraduate funding (Jagsi et al 2007;Eloy et al 2014), twelve on postgraduate training (Thorndyke et al 2006;Sanfey et al 2011;Ries et al 2012;Ries et al 2009;Garman, Wingard, and Reznik 2001;Dannels et al 2008;McDade et al 2004;Daley, Wingard, and Reznik 2006;Wingard, Garman, and Reznik 2004;Segal et al 2006;Campion et al 2016;Chang et al 2016), three on mentoring programmes (Mayer et al 2013;Varkey et al 2012;Farag et al 2012), five related to interventions targeted at medical students (Funston, Young, and Lomas 2011;Solomon et al 2003;Coleman, Blatt, and Greenberg 2012;Choi et al 2013;Areephanthu et al 2015)and two on institutional change (Fried et al 1996;Villablanca et al 2013). Of the twenty-four papers, thirteen (54%) had a before and after designs, ten were case control studies (42%) and one reported action research (4%).…”
Section: Quality and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sambunjak et al 83 have recently reviewed the impact of leadership training programs in academic medical centers. Additional programs that have reported on their success include Boston Children's Hospital, 84 the University of Virginia, 85 the Cleveland Clinic (including a summary of outcomes after 14 years of leadership program operation), 86,87 the Mayo Clinic, 88 the University of Nebraska's Administrative Colloquium, 89 St Joseph's Hospital in Toronto, 90 and the Columbus Children's Hospital. 91 A fuller description of the curriculum and format for 1 such program is available from the Cleveland Clinic's Leading in Health Care course.…”
Section: Leadership Development Practices and Models Of Ei Varymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership skills in medicine are scarce resources essential for the field to adapt to current and future challenges. The literature reports results of leadership development programs for faculty but programs for undergraduate medical students appear less often [2,3]. The medical leaders of the future must be equipped to understand and thrive in the complex environment of health care delivery, learn to work effectively in teams, and be prepared to meet a wide range of social needs [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%