2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b2-637-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the User Strategy on 2d and 3d City Maps Based on Novel Scanpath Comparison Method and Graph Visualization

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The paper is dealing with scanpath comparison of eye-tracking data recorded during case study focused on the evaluation of 2D and 3D city maps. The experiment contained screenshots from three map portals. Two types of maps were used -standard map and 3D visualization. Respondents' task was to find particular point symbol on the map as fast as possible. Scanpath comparison is one group of the eye-tracking data analyses methods used for revealing the strategy of the respondents. In cartographic studies,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach involved a string-edit-distance method which had been previously used in many eye-tracking studies to compare different participant groups (i.e., [76][77][78][79]). Specifically, ScanGraph calculated the similarity of scanpaths according to Levenshtein distance (i.e., [43,80,81]) and visualized the results calculated using the multimatch method, which can only indicate similarity between two scanpaths. The present study used batch calculations to calculate the similarity between all possible pairs of participants, in other words, 961 calculations (31 × 31) for each of the ten stimuli in the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach involved a string-edit-distance method which had been previously used in many eye-tracking studies to compare different participant groups (i.e., [76][77][78][79]). Specifically, ScanGraph calculated the similarity of scanpaths according to Levenshtein distance (i.e., [43,80,81]) and visualized the results calculated using the multimatch method, which can only indicate similarity between two scanpaths. The present study used batch calculations to calculate the similarity between all possible pairs of participants, in other words, 961 calculations (31 × 31) for each of the ten stimuli in the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of visual scanning paths sequence analysis is to analyze the visual transition sequences between AOIs within a certain time range in a longitudinal manner. By using characters to represent the AOI where the fixations are located, the expression of visual scanning path can be simplified as strings, which allows for quantitative analysis based on fixed visual sequences [16,40]. For example, Xu, Chong et al performed an overall similarity analysis between the visual sequences of participants who successfully identified hazards with those who failed and found that successful participants followed a similar visual pattern of hazards searching, i.e., had similar visual sequences [16].…”
Section: Methodological Deficiencies and Limitations In Chr Visual Patterns Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because what can be seen and recorded is the world composed of objects and surfaces, but humans can make perceptions and associations about the meaning of the observed visual attributes. The human cognitive system uses heuristic problem-solving shortcuts to make inferences about the received information for generating perceptions of the world rather than exhaustive algorithms [40,41]. In the current application paradigm of computer vision, searching for the presence of a feature is faster than for the absence of a feature [18], which is also the reason why a static scene with potential hazards may be more difficult to be recognized by computer vision than a dynamic scene.…”
Section: Ppe-related Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a portion of studies interpreted the average fixation duration as the degree of concentration and found that the duration of fixation reflects the time of individual understanding and processing, which means that the shorter the time, the less attention, leading to recognition errors [65]. However, partial studies interpreted the same indicator as the experience of subjects; that is, the shorter the fixation time, the less time spent in the scenario, resulting in better recognition performance [66]. Moreover, regarding visual trajectories, some scholars claimed that successful hazard recognizers usually spread their attention within the working environment [67].…”
Section: Develop Intuitive Devices For Hazard Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%