2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2780-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the validity of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting assessment in outpatients using the Japanese version of the MASCC antiemesis tool

Abstract: The results of the study showed that the Japanese version of MAT is a highly reliable tool for CINV assessment, indicating that it is valid for assessing CINV in outpatients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13) Meanwhile, MAT, a patient self-reporting questionnaire, has been developed by MASCC and is expected to provide a convenient and supportive tool for clinician evaluations of acute and delayed nausea and/or vomiting. 5) A positive correlation in the severity scale between the patient diary and MAT was observed in patients with solid tumors, whereas the concordance rate between the physician assessments and patient descriptions was relatively low. 6) To our knowledge, the present study is the first report on the comparison of the CINV severity scores between CTCAE and MAT for only patients with hematological malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13) Meanwhile, MAT, a patient self-reporting questionnaire, has been developed by MASCC and is expected to provide a convenient and supportive tool for clinician evaluations of acute and delayed nausea and/or vomiting. 5) A positive correlation in the severity scale between the patient diary and MAT was observed in patients with solid tumors, whereas the concordance rate between the physician assessments and patient descriptions was relatively low. 6) To our knowledge, the present study is the first report on the comparison of the CINV severity scores between CTCAE and MAT for only patients with hematological malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The MAT has been validated in outpatients with solid tumors in the United Kingdom and United States of America, 5) Japan, 6) and China. 7) The reports from America 5) and China 7) found a strong positive correlation between the Rhodes Index for Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (INVR), as a patient's diary, with the reliability and effectiveness of MAT records for solid tumors. The report from Japan 6) showed a strong positive correlation between the patient's diary and MAT records.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MASCC Antiemetic evaluation tool table (MAT): This tool was used to assess the occurrence of acute CINV (completed on day 4 of chemotherapy) and delayed CINV (completed on day 8 of chemotherapy) in patients ( 9 ). Patients who did not experience vomiting and/or significant nausea and had no record of rescue antiemetic were classified as “no CINV”; their family caregivers were assigned to No-CINV group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%