2019
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.14323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of thermal and nonthermal treatment of margarine: Pasteurization process efficiency, kinetics of microbial destruction, and changes in thermophysical characteristics

Abstract: The objective of this study was the thermophysical characterization and microbial evaluation of the commercial margarine production process. Thermal destruction of Escherichia coli (K‐12) was characterized between 60 and 70°C with a decimal reduction time (D value) between 4.44 and 0.22 min and a Z value of 7.72°C. Pulsed light treatment as a nonthermal alternative was used for comparison; however, the effectiveness was very weak with a 90% surface decontamination yield after 20 s of high‐intensity pulsed ligh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are close to those reported by Vatankhah et al. (2019) on a commercial margarine. The flow properties of margarines enriched with honey are fitted to the Arrhenius model to obtain activation energy values (Table 3c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are close to those reported by Vatankhah et al. (2019) on a commercial margarine. The flow properties of margarines enriched with honey are fitted to the Arrhenius model to obtain activation energy values (Table 3c).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Samples in solidified agar were incubated at 37 °C for 12 h prior to colony forming unit (CFU) counting. The average values of CFU of each mL sample were processed further to estimate D-value and z-value according to a previous study (Vatankhah et al 2019). D-value is the decimal reduction time and Z-value is the temperature sensitivity indicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%