Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement behavior

Li, Guofa; Zhu, Fangping; Zhang, Tingru; Wang, Ying; He, Shengfan; Qu, Xingda

doi:10.1109/itsc.2018.8569917

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We found that input sensed via nomadic devices was mainly kinesthetic and tactile. Kinesthetic input was performed on handheld devices, such as buttons on a smartphone [224], gaming controller [146], or wearables, e.g., smartwatch [131] and smart ring [118]. Similarly, tactile input was performed on touchscreen handheld devices, e.g., smartphone [260] or tablet [251], and a wearable smartwatch [285].…”

Section: Interaction Locationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, 30 publications used auditory, kinesthetic, or tactile modalities for multimodal input. Regarding auditory input, speech was used dominantly in combination with, e.g., button [224], gesture [289], emotion [411], touch [285], or heart rate [204]. Kinesthetic modalities were used diversely, e.g., combined with GSR [239], Skin Temp.…”

Section: Multimodal Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Design Space for Human Sensor and Actuator Focused In-Vehicle Interaction Based on a Systematic Literature Review

Jansen

Colley

Rukzio

2022

Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Automotive user interfaces constantly change due to increasing automation, novel features, additional applications, and user demands. While in-vehicle interaction can utilize numerous promising modalities, no existing overview includes an extensive set of human sensors and actuators and interaction locations throughout the vehicle interior. We conducted a systematic literature review of 327 publications leading to a design space for in-vehicle interaction that outlines existing and lack of work regarding input and output modalities, locations, and multimodal interaction. To investigate user acceptance of possible modalities and locations inferred from existing work and gaps unveiled in our design space, we conducted an online study (N=48). The study revealed users' general acceptance of novel modalities (e.g., brain or thermal activity) and interaction with locations other than the front (e.g., seat or table). Our work helps practitioners evaluate key design decisions, exploit trends, and explore new areas in the domain of in-vehicle interaction.

show abstract

Section: Interaction Locationsmentioning

confidence: 99%