1993
DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90237-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three needle-less intravenous therapy devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17] When more recent prevention activities focused on the development of engineered sharps injury protections (ESIPs)-devices that incorporate active or passive mechanisms to help prevent needlestick injuries-OSHA revised its standard to mandate that health care workplaces evaluate ESIPs. 18,19 Initial evidence suggests that using ESIPs reduces the risk of needlestick injuries; [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] the Government Accounting Office estimates that this reduction is as great as 29%. 30 The actual rate of adoption of ESIPs in U.S. hospitals by type of device, however, and the factors associated with adoption remained unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] When more recent prevention activities focused on the development of engineered sharps injury protections (ESIPs)-devices that incorporate active or passive mechanisms to help prevent needlestick injuries-OSHA revised its standard to mandate that health care workplaces evaluate ESIPs. 18,19 Initial evidence suggests that using ESIPs reduces the risk of needlestick injuries; [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] the Government Accounting Office estimates that this reduction is as great as 29%. 30 The actual rate of adoption of ESIPs in U.S. hospitals by type of device, however, and the factors associated with adoption remained unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] When more recent prevention activities focused on the development of engineered sharps injury protections (ESIPs)-devices that incorporate active or passive mechanisms to help prevent needlestick injuries-OSHA revised its standard to mandate that health care workplaces evaluate ESIPs. 18,19 Initial evidence suggests that using ESIPs reduces the risk of needlestick injuries; [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] the Government Accounting Office estimates that this reduction is as great as 29%. 30 The actual rate of adoption of ESIPs in U.S. hospitals by type of device, however, and the factors associated with adoption remained unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%