2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three serological tests for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in Pakistan by estimating sensitivity and specificity using Bayesian latent class analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a Bayesian latent class approach was used to evaluate three diagnostic tests simultaneously for field conditions in Pakistan. The result from the evaluation study suggests using RBT and C-ELISA in parallel combination produced the highest overall sensitivity and specificity (Arif et al 2018), when considered as their sum. Consequently, this definition was adopted in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a Bayesian latent class approach was used to evaluate three diagnostic tests simultaneously for field conditions in Pakistan. The result from the evaluation study suggests using RBT and C-ELISA in parallel combination produced the highest overall sensitivity and specificity (Arif et al 2018), when considered as their sum. Consequently, this definition was adopted in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The result from the evaluation study suggests using RBT and C‐ELISA in parallel combination produced the highest overall sensitivity and specificity (Arif et al . ), when considered as their sum. Consequently, this definition was adopted in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBPT and c-ELSA were combined to screen and diagnose brucellosis in China especially in some remote areas. The sensitivity and specificity of these two methods has been described previously [21, 45]. However, these two methods are not good tools for diagnosing brucellosis in the laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutoff OD of 0.3 was used to identify positive reactions [19]. The sensitivity and specificity of these two methods have been validated as useful tools for brucellosis screening [20, 21]. Additionally, all of the serum samples were screened using the ELISA method to evaluate the changes of Chlamydia abortus -specific antibody titer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found a seroprevalence of 6.65% for brucellosis in camels. This is expected because the disease is endemic in the country with multiple evidences on varying rate of prevalence in human, small and large ruminants (Shafee et al, 2011;Arif et al, 2018;Saeed et al, 2019) and camels (Fatima et al, 2016;Shahzad et al, 2017). Despite zoonotic implications and potential of Brucella spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%