2016
DOI: 10.21836/pem20160505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of tidal volume measurements of the anaesthesia device Tafonius® in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: The anaesthesiologic risk is higher in horses than in other domesticated animal species and thereby ventilation is a vital problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the anaesthesia device Tafonius ® tidal volume measurements in vitro as well as in vivo. In an in vitro study the whole system was flushed by air to reduce the air moisture to a minimum. The preparation of the anaesthesia device was exactly the same, as if there was a surgery on a patient. But instead of a horse, a seven liter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All devices were calibrated following manufacturer’s guidelines before each anesthesia; the capnograph of the NICO device was calibrated with room air before each experiment (infrared sensor with a response time <60 ms and accuracy of ±2 mmHg) and the accuracy of the pneumotachograph was verified with a 100-mL calibration syringe before and after all measurements (allowed accuracy of ±3% following manufacturers guidelines for the calibration set-up). The accuracy of the volume measurement of the flow-partioning device used in our set-up in connection with the NICO device was verified in an in vitro experiment published elsewhere ( 25 ). The difference between the reading of the flow-partitioning device in combination with the NICO device and the 10 L calibration syringe was 0.73 ± 4.3% (mean ± SD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…All devices were calibrated following manufacturer’s guidelines before each anesthesia; the capnograph of the NICO device was calibrated with room air before each experiment (infrared sensor with a response time <60 ms and accuracy of ±2 mmHg) and the accuracy of the pneumotachograph was verified with a 100-mL calibration syringe before and after all measurements (allowed accuracy of ±3% following manufacturers guidelines for the calibration set-up). The accuracy of the volume measurement of the flow-partioning device used in our set-up in connection with the NICO device was verified in an in vitro experiment published elsewhere ( 25 ). The difference between the reading of the flow-partitioning device in combination with the NICO device and the 10 L calibration syringe was 0.73 ± 4.3% (mean ± SD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Interpretation of the results of this study assumes that spirometry is accurately measuring VT. The accuracy of the flow‐partitioning device in combination with the NICO spirometer was evaluated in an in vitro model using the same ventilator and circle system set‐up as in the study described here (mean difference less than 1%) . In an in vivo study using the flow‐partitioning device and NICO combination in anaesthetised horses limits of agreement were found to be within ±10% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the tidal volume (VT NICO ), a flow‐partitioning device connected to a human spirometry unit (NICO)j was used. The NICO device was calibrated following manufacturer's guidelines before each anaesthesia and the accuracy of the volume measurement of the flow‐partitioning device in conjunction with the NICO device and breathing system used in this study was verified in an in vitro experiment published elsewhere . The flow‐partitioning device was placed between the endotracheal tube and the Y‐piece of the circle system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the YF-S201 achieves the objective of measuring air volume entering the lung of CPR dummies in respiratory maneuvers providing spirometric results. As stated before, the incorporation of sensors such as those presented in [1,2,4,19,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] is not feasible for this purpose due to, mainly, its high cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform spirometry, a spirometer is used, which can be: (i) of volume (sealed in water, piston, and bellows [35]); (ii) of flow (differential pressure or pneumotacometers [36], thermistors, Pitot and turbinometers [35]); or (iii) portable [37] of volume or flow [25]. The respiratory volume sensors used in these types of equipment have a high cost and some of them perform indirect measurements, discarding their application in medical simulators or dummies, as in the case of Hamiltonian sensors coupled to differential pressure sensors [38], flow mass sensors [39] and airflow meter [40] rotary or vibratory beam and shell flow meters [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%