2017
DOI: 10.15406/ijbsbe.2017.02.00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Tomographic Brain Reconstruction Techniques: Case of the Shepp-Logan Phantom

Abstract: Carcinogenic tumors are the leading cause of death in the world. When clinicians have excellent shot, they are able to detect a tumor early and eradicate it easily by chemotherapy or by simple surgery. We propose in this paper to compare different methods of tomographic reconstruction of the brain from the point of view of the quality of the image provided, in order to propose to the physicians the algorithms which guarantee them the best image results. We use two comparison metrics based on the PSNR (Peak Sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scales with 5, 6, 7 or 100 levels of appreciation can be used. Table 1 presents an example of a scale, this method is very widely used to validate a quantitative or objective metric [20], and it is what was used in the context of this article.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales with 5, 6, 7 or 100 levels of appreciation can be used. Table 1 presents an example of a scale, this method is very widely used to validate a quantitative or objective metric [20], and it is what was used in the context of this article.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-5 The deterministic iterative methods which allow a better quantification of the noise have been implemented in the framework of this work, the most successful methods are the ART method [6][7] in its variants ART-DS, 7 kaczmarz, 8 Sym-Kaczmarz, 9 and the SIRT method 10 in its SIRT-DS 11 and Cimmino 10 variants. These iterative methods consist in the correction of the reconstructed image f by successive iterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%