Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers

Malinowski, Andrzej; Majchrzak-Baczmańska, Dominika; Pogoda, Krzysztof; Maciołek-Blewniewska, Grazyna; Antosiak, Beata

doi:10.17772/gp/1563

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy was also reported to be a safe procedure with benefits of application instead of laparotomy due to: shortened hospital stay, fewer complications, less hemoglobin loss and a better cosmetic result [15][16][17]. According to Malinowski et al [18], a total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy is a better alternative method than laparotomy that is characterized by a significantly smaller percentage of complications, better cosmetic results and a shorter hospital stay when performed by an experienced surgeon. Minimal access surgery appeared to be the preferred approach being associated with a lower pain score, a shorter hospitalization, and an earlier resumption of daily activities when compared with open surgery in randomized controlled trials [19,20].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Obesity as a risk factor of in-hospital outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic surgical mode

Januszek¹,

Barnaś

Skręt-Magierło

et al. 2020

Ginekol Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Obesity as a risk factor of in-hospital outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic surgical mode

Januszek¹,

Barnaś

Skręt-Magierło

et al. 2020

Ginekol Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tratamiento laparoscópico del cáncer de endometrio. Experiencia institucional

Rocha-Guevara

Quijano-Castro

Cortés-Martínez

et al. 2015

Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Robotic-Assisted, and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review

Ioana,

Voiță-Mekereș,

Motofelea

et al. 2024

Diagnostics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive techniques in gynecological cancer surgery, specifically laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs), robotic-assisted hysterectomies (RHs), and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (LAVHs). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed and MedLine from January 2010 to August 2024. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria such as a focus on LHs, RHs, or LAVHs, and reporting on key outcomes like recovery rates, overall survival (OS) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative complications, and surgery time. Exclusion criteria were applied to omit non-randomized studies, non-English publications, and those lacking relevant data. Results: The analysis included 35 studies on gynecological cancers and surgical procedures, conducted across multiple countries. Among them, 8 were RCTs from countries like the Netherlands and Italy, while 20 were retrospective cohort studies from China and the USA. The studies varied in design, cancer type, and participant age, highlighting diverse surgical approaches and the adaptation of minimally invasive techniques in gynecological cancer treatment. LH and RH demonstrated similar oncological safety with comparable OS and DFS rates. RH was associated with reduced blood loss, but longer operative times compared to LH. LAVH showed favorable perioperative outcomes, including shorter hospital stays and faster recovery, but was less frequently studied in advanced-stage cancers. Complication rates were generally lower in minimally invasive surgeries compared to open procedures. The findings support the efficacy of LH and RH as viable alternatives to open surgery, with specific advantages depending on patient and disease characteristics. Conclusions: Minimally invasive techniques in gynecological cancer surgery offer significant advantages in terms of recovery and complication rates. Despite these benefits, further research is needed to confirm their oncological safety and overall effectiveness compared to traditional open surgeries.

show abstract

Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Obesity as a risk factor of in-hospital outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic surgical mode

Obesity as a risk factor of in-hospital outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic surgical mode

Tratamiento laparoscópico del cáncer de endometrio. Experiencia institucional

Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Robotic-Assisted, and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uterine and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About