Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2004.1333857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of tracking reliability metrics based on information theory and normalized correlation

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several previously defined informationtheoretic metrics including [17,27,21,16,24,13]. However, these metrics do not handle all of the scenarios involved in spatio-temporal tracking and do not include the list of properties shown in Table 7.…”
Section: Comparison To Previously Defined Information-theoretic Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several previously defined informationtheoretic metrics including [17,27,21,16,24,13]. However, these metrics do not handle all of the scenarios involved in spatio-temporal tracking and do not include the list of properties shown in Table 7.…”
Section: Comparison To Previously Defined Information-theoretic Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in Section 2 the tracker uses conditional linear Gaussian models for the density functions. For comparison of two Gaussian density the Kullback Leibler divergence is of great interest [10] [3]. For the sake of speed Mahalanobis could be a good measurement but it will not provide an error measurement when the two Gaussian distributions are having the same mean, albeit with different covariances.…”
Section: Online Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, a single metric based on information theory will be described which captures all the aforementioned track pathologies and provides a comprehensive overall performance measure. This work is not to be confused with Loutas' appearance-based information theoretic tracker evaluation approach in [10] where comparison is made between the object reference chip and the track chip. This paper takes a different approach by measuring directly the similarity between the truth and the observed track states.…”
Section: Existing Tracking Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%