2020
DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of training programmes mapped to the new internal medicine curriculum

Abstract: In preparation for the internal medicine training (IMT) programme introduced in 2019, the core medical training (CMT) programme in London was made 'IMT-ready' in 2018 by creating new rotations that reflected the compulsory requirements of the first 2 years of the IMT curriculum, including provision of the requisite number of critical care placements. Core medical trainees completed posts within the 'IMT-ready' programme between August 2018 and August 2019, during which time the trainee experience was evaluated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The review led to structural reforms in postgraduate training across both medical and surgical specialties. In the case of medicine, for example, a new 3-year Internal Medicine Training (IMT) curriculum was introduced, with an emphasis on more generalist, generic skills in those first 3 years 2. The review also recognised the inflexibility of postgraduate training, which can make it difficult for trainees to change specialties or take time out of a training programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The review led to structural reforms in postgraduate training across both medical and surgical specialties. In the case of medicine, for example, a new 3-year Internal Medicine Training (IMT) curriculum was introduced, with an emphasis on more generalist, generic skills in those first 3 years 2. The review also recognised the inflexibility of postgraduate training, which can make it difficult for trainees to change specialties or take time out of a training programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of medicine, for example, a new 3-year Internal Medicine Training (IMT) curriculum was introduced, with an emphasis on more generalist, generic skills in those first 3 years. 2 The review also recognised the inflexibility of postgraduate training, which can make it difficult for trainees to change specialties or take time out of a training programme. It was noted that this was a contributory factor in the decision by many early year trainees not to enter specialty training straight after their 2-year postgraduate Foundation programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new process aims to assess 'capabilities in practice' (CIPs) with less emphasis on multiple independent competences being observed and more focus on overall actual practice leading to accredited physicians who are 'IMT ready', able to progress to higher specialist training programmes. 3 There is also a planned change from August 2021 in the general surgery curriculum with a new outcome-based training programme with individual progression based on the achievement of outcomes collectively described as the 'capabilities of a day-1 consultant in general surgery with a special interest'. 4 Assessments will be based on progression through the 'complex integrated skills' in areas described as capabilities in practice in a similar way to that proposed by the JRCPTB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birns and colleagues have summarised their work implementing the internal medical training (IMT) curriculum to make programmes 'IMT ready' and the impact of these changes on trainees. 2 Hallewell et al describe the implementation of the supported return to training (SuppoRTT) programme, created to support all trainees who have taken a break from clinical work. 3 This is never more relevant than for those doctors who have been recalled urgently to clinical work from out-of-programme activity and utilising the structures put in place by this initiative delivered by Health Education England across its regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%