2010
DOI: 10.1021/nn9010076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Transparent Carbon Nanotube Networks of Homogeneous Electronic Type

Abstract: In this report, we present a description of the optical and electronic properties of as-deposited, annealed, and chemically treated single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) films showing metallic or semiconducting behavior. As-deposited and annealed semiconducting SWNT films were significantly less conductive than metallic SWNT films; however, chemical treatment of semiconducting SWNT films resulted in sheet resistance values as low as 60 Omega x sq(-1) in comparison to 76 Omega x sq(-1) for similarly processed me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the CNT network in the experiments contains both metallic and semiconducting tubes, the above approximation is still reasonable for the following reasons. If the semiconducting CNTs are highly doped in an ambient environment, their properties become comparable with those of metallic ones (34,35). Semiconducting CNTs on nonpolar substrates, such as the PDMS used in this work, typically exhibit minimal doping and consequently, have much higher tube resistance and contact resistance (36,37).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the CNT network in the experiments contains both metallic and semiconducting tubes, the above approximation is still reasonable for the following reasons. If the semiconducting CNTs are highly doped in an ambient environment, their properties become comparable with those of metallic ones (34,35). Semiconducting CNTs on nonpolar substrates, such as the PDMS used in this work, typically exhibit minimal doping and consequently, have much higher tube resistance and contact resistance (36,37).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exacerbating the problem, the junction resistance between metallic and semiconducting CNTs is much higher than that between metallic tubes 106. Therefore, it is predicted that a film made entirely from metallic nanotubes, or a mixture of metallic and degeneratively doped p‐type CNTs, will exhibit superior conductivity to a film made from unseparated, undoped tubes134 (producing larger diameter CNTs will also mitigate the deleterious effects of semiconducting tubes by lowering the bandgap). To this end, much research has gone into finding suitable dopants and scalable techniques towards producing all metallic CNTs.…”
Section: Emerging Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotubes possess several properties that make them good candidates as electrodes: high intrinsic conductivity, solution processability, durability, and the potential for production at low cost 11. However, the large variations in tube types, such as diameters, lengths, and chirality, the difficulties in forming uniform films over large areas, and the large tube‐to‐tube junction resistance have prevented the adoption of CNTs as a TE by industry, though important research on dopants and methods of processing continues to improve CNT films 12, 13. Graphene, despite its relatively recent discovery in 2003, has almost matched, if not exceeded, CNTs in performance as a TE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%