2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/3830245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Traumatic Subdural Hematoma Volume by Using Image Segmentation Assessment Based on Deep Learning

Abstract: Rapid and accurate evaluations of hematoma volume can guide the treatment of traumatic subdural hematoma. We aim to explore the consistency between the measurement results of traumatic subdural hematoma (TSDH) using a deep learn-based image segmentation algorithm. A retrospective study was conducted on 90 CT images of patients diagnosed with TSDH in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022. All image data were measured by manual segmentation, convolutional neural networks (CNN) algorithm segmentation, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Farzaneh (2020) utilized a random forest model to detect and classify the severity of acute SDHs, achieving a sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.92 [88]. Chen (2022) employed a CNN for volumetric assessment, with the results closely mirroring manual segmentation with an AUROC of 0.83 [89]. Another CNN model designed for comprehensive SDH evaluation, including thickness, volume, and midline shift, showcased a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 96.4% [90].…”
Section: Detecting and Quantifying Subdural Hematomas With Machine Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farzaneh (2020) utilized a random forest model to detect and classify the severity of acute SDHs, achieving a sensitivity of 0.99 and specificity of 0.92 [88]. Chen (2022) employed a CNN for volumetric assessment, with the results closely mirroring manual segmentation with an AUROC of 0.83 [89]. Another CNN model designed for comprehensive SDH evaluation, including thickness, volume, and midline shift, showcased a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 96.4% [90].…”
Section: Detecting and Quantifying Subdural Hematomas With Machine Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%