2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Trends in Preexposure Prophylaxis Prescriptions During the First 6 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York State

Abstract: This cohort study uses time-series models to estimate preexposure prophylaxis prescription trends during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York State in 2020.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm the major impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PrEP use in France, as already reported for other health products 17 , 18 , 28 and in other countries. 20 , 22 , 29 , 30 In addition, they draw attention to the substantial frequency of early PrEP discontinuation. The negative impact of PrEP discontinuation on its real-life preventive effectiveness was demonstrated in a recent study conducted by our team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results confirm the major impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PrEP use in France, as already reported for other health products 17 , 18 , 28 and in other countries. 20 , 22 , 29 , 30 In addition, they draw attention to the substantial frequency of early PrEP discontinuation. The negative impact of PrEP discontinuation on its real-life preventive effectiveness was demonstrated in a recent study conducted by our team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discerning the impact of PAW was made challenging by the closely timed seasonal impacts of Thanksgiving and Christmas and the relatively post-PAW observation period due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which significantly reduced PrEP prescriptions in NYS. 23 These data do not permit an understanding of the mechanism by which PAW increased PrEP prescriptions (ie, how persons were exposed to the campaign, how much of the impact was consumer vs provider driven, etc) or the relationship between the increased prescriptions and unmet need for PrEP. Race and ethnicity were missing or unknown for 30% of total prescriptions and 40% of new prescriptions.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%