1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4203(98)00028-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two cross-flow ultrafiltration membranes for isolating marine organic colloids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bottles were cleaned by soaking in 0.5 mol L Ϫ1 HCl followed by 0.1 mol L Ϫ1 NaOH for 24 h each. Water samples were filtered through precombusted (470ЊC for 4 h) 0.7-m GF/F glass fiber filters (Whatman International), followed by concentration using a Pellicon 2 Mini tangential flow ultrafiltration system equipped with a nominal 1,000 Da molecular-weight cut-off regenerated cellulose membrane (Millipore) (Dai et al 1998). The water samples were concentrated to 100 ml at an inlet pressure of 10 psi and an outlet pressure of 8 psi.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bottles were cleaned by soaking in 0.5 mol L Ϫ1 HCl followed by 0.1 mol L Ϫ1 NaOH for 24 h each. Water samples were filtered through precombusted (470ЊC for 4 h) 0.7-m GF/F glass fiber filters (Whatman International), followed by concentration using a Pellicon 2 Mini tangential flow ultrafiltration system equipped with a nominal 1,000 Da molecular-weight cut-off regenerated cellulose membrane (Millipore) (Dai et al 1998). The water samples were concentrated to 100 ml at an inlet pressure of 10 psi and an outlet pressure of 8 psi.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, CFF has mainly been used to collect marine colloids and there are several evaluations of the performance of different filtration systems used with high-salinity waters (Gustafsson et al, 1996;Greenamoyer and Moran, 1996;Dai et al, 1998). Ultrafiltration of fresh waters seems to be more demanding, and systematic CFF experiments for fresh waters are sparse (Buffle et al, 1978;Guo et al, 2001;Larsson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFF techniques adapted for this study have been used previously for studies of trace constituents in both freshwater and marine environments (27)(28)(29)(30). The CFF membranes used for this study (consisting of three parallel-configured, spiral-wound CFF membranes, Prep/ Scale PLAC, Millipore Corp.) are composed of regenerated cellulose and are rated by the manufacturer to exhibit a nominal molecular weight cutoff of 1 kDa (29)(30)(31). The concentration of colloid-associated Pu (Pucolloidal, 1 kDa -0.2 µm) is calculated from the Pu concentrations measured in the permeate (Pupermeate) and retentate (Puretentate) sample fractions and a concentration factor term (cf), which is the ratio of the initial mass of the sample to the mass of the retentate fraction at the conclusion of CFF processing:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of studies have shown that the retention characteristics of different CFF systems vary dramatically due to membrane-specific differences, operational procedures, and chemical-specific properties of the colloid of interest (27,30,32). The CFF membranes used in this study were thoroughly evaluated under operating conditions identical to those encountered in the field just prior to sampling (30).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation