2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(03)00200-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two portable lead-monitoring methods at mining sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The r 2 values for the two methods were 0.972, 0.964, and 0.982 in the three types of lead-using industry, also with no significant differences being present. Our results are similar to those obtained in previous FPXRF studies 3,4,[23][24][25] . Morley et al reported that the regression coefficient for data near PEL was less than 1 (i.e., 0.826), with a positive method bias due to the high detection limit of FPXRF, and considered that applying FPXRF methods rather than the standard laboratory method would help to protect workers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The r 2 values for the two methods were 0.972, 0.964, and 0.982 in the three types of lead-using industry, also with no significant differences being present. Our results are similar to those obtained in previous FPXRF studies 3,4,[23][24][25] . Morley et al reported that the regression coefficient for data near PEL was less than 1 (i.e., 0.826), with a positive method bias due to the high detection limit of FPXRF, and considered that applying FPXRF methods rather than the standard laboratory method would help to protect workers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This and other stud ies have shown the po ten tial of FPXRF spec trom e try for the de ter mi na tion of Pb con cen tra tions in contam i nated soils from ar eas in flu enced by metal-ore min ing and pro cess ing, ir re spec tive of the soil min er al ogy, bed rock li thology or con cen tra tion lev els of this el e ment (Drake et al, 2003;Raab et al, 2005). De ter mi na tions of Pb by the FPXRF and ICP-MS meth ods both re vealed sim i lar co ef fi cients of de ter mina tion and nearly iden ti cal con cen tra tion lev els of this el e ment.…”
Section: Lessons Drawn From Fpxrf and Icp-ms Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The FPXRF anal y sis has found ap pli ca tions in many ar eas, in clud ing de ter mi na tions of trace el e ments in var i ous en vi ronmen tal com part ments, in clud ing soils (Drake et al, 2003;Melquiades and Appoloni, 2004;Mäkinen et al, 2005;Kilbride et al, 2006;Carr et al, 2008;Hürkamp et al, 2009;Radu and Di a mond, 2009;Higueras et al, 2012;Stamm and Hoogestraat, 2012;Bosco, 2013). Many the o ret i cal and prac tical as pects of this an a lyt i cal method can be found in the su perb com pen dium by Potts and West (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field portable XRF spectrometers can also be used for rapid and accurate determinations of elements, such as silicon and phosphorus in plants (Reidinger et al, 2012), for analyzing dust wipe samples (Sterling et al, 2000) or rock and mineral specimens (Yuan et al, 2014). Determinations of lead in environmental samples, especially in heavily polluted areas are one of the main applications of portable XRF spectrometer (Drake et al, 2003;Schwarz et al, 2012;Scott et al, 2013).…”
Section: Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that about 1000 measurements per day can be taken by a single instrument, providing valuable data, especially for heterogeneous soils which are physically disturbed and polluted, such as those in the mining areas or industrial brownfields (Drake et al, 2003;González-Corrochano et al, 2014).…”
Section: Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%