2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two WAM white capping parameterizations using parallel unstructured SWAN with application to the Northern Gulf of Mexico, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an appropriate approach for simulation of wave height as a result of generation and growth by local wind, and the default method for resolving whitecapping dissipation in SWAN and other popular spectral models like WAM and Mike21-SW. To achieve higher simulation accuracies for wave height and wave period, calibrations of the model for the whitecapping parameter and the wave period parameter delta are necessary (Allahdadi et al, 2017;Siadatmousavi et al, 2012;Niroomandi et al, 2018;Allahdadi et al, 2004a). However, wave model applications for different regions (including open-ocean and shelf waters) show that Komen-type methods tend to underestimate both peak and mean wave periods (SWAN, 2015;van Vledder et al, 2016;Siadatmousavi et al, 2011). For the case of pure wind-wave growth, this problem is the result of underestimating the spectral energy at low frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an appropriate approach for simulation of wave height as a result of generation and growth by local wind, and the default method for resolving whitecapping dissipation in SWAN and other popular spectral models like WAM and Mike21-SW. To achieve higher simulation accuracies for wave height and wave period, calibrations of the model for the whitecapping parameter and the wave period parameter delta are necessary (Allahdadi et al, 2017;Siadatmousavi et al, 2012;Niroomandi et al, 2018;Allahdadi et al, 2004a). However, wave model applications for different regions (including open-ocean and shelf waters) show that Komen-type methods tend to underestimate both peak and mean wave periods (SWAN, 2015;van Vledder et al, 2016;Siadatmousavi et al, 2011). For the case of pure wind-wave growth, this problem is the result of underestimating the spectral energy at low frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strictly speaking, both coefficients cannot be interpreted independently of each other: for example, the choice of the coefficient Cdis depends on the set value of dis. In addition, the optimum setup of Cdis and dis parameters is largely determined by the physical conditions for the generation and propagation of surface waves [13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Кроме того, оптимальная настройка параметров C dis и  dis во многом определяется физическими условиями генерации и распростране-ния поверхностного волнения [13,14].…”
unclassified