2020
DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two xenobiotic reductases from Pseudomonas putida for their suitability for magnetic nanoparticle‐directed enzyme prodrug therapy as a novel approach to cancer treatment

Abstract: Traditional cancer treatment methods, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have progressed over recent years; however, there are still many limitations associated with these treatments such as the lack of selectivity between healthy and cancerous cells (Braun & Seymour, 2011; Brown & Giaccia, 1998). One approach being investigated to improve the selectivity of chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst this appears to be contrary to what might be expected, it could be attributed to a well-documented effect, known as the Hormetic effect [ 40 ]. The Hormetic effect is evident from the characteristic inverted- U-shaped response on the graph [ 40 ], and it is a phenomenon that we have come to expect when testing CB1954’s cell killing potency in SK-OV-3 cells [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Whilst this appears to be contrary to what might be expected, it could be attributed to a well-documented effect, known as the Hormetic effect [ 40 ]. The Hormetic effect is evident from the characteristic inverted- U-shaped response on the graph [ 40 ], and it is a phenomenon that we have come to expect when testing CB1954’s cell killing potency in SK-OV-3 cells [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell viability assays carried out by Vass et al on the SK-OV-3 cell line appeared to show superior results in terms of the cell viability after treatment compared to the data reported in this study [ 44 ]. An explanation for this difference in reported cell viability is that, in their work, they incubated their cells with the additional cofactor (NAD(P)H) whereas in this dataset only the intracellular cofactor is used, with no additional cofactor being added as this gives a better indication of how the treatment will perform in vivo [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. The fact that a killing of the cells was observed indicates that the treatment was successfully up taken into the SK-OV-3 cells, where it could access the intracellular cofactor to produce toxic products and induce cell death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations